<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 3 &#8211; Bloggers, Journalism &amp; Defamation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/</link>
	<description>Now offering CLE credit for California Lawyers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mittie Duong</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Mittie Duong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=122#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Pretty good post, very helpful information. Never ever thought I would discover the info I would like in this article. I&#039;ve been looking throughout the internet for a while now and was starting to get irritated. Fortunately, I happened onto your website and acquired exactly what I was hunting for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty good post, very helpful information. Never ever thought I would discover the info I would like in this article. I&#8217;ve been looking throughout the internet for a while now and was starting to get irritated. Fortunately, I happened onto your website and acquired exactly what I was hunting for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Saku, Esq,</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Saku, Esq,</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=122#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Great podcast!

Looking forward to the next one.

Keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great podcast!</p>
<p>Looking forward to the next one.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Moffitt</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/14/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Moffitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=122#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Wow, really great update.  There seemed to be a lot of cases covered today.

One note: I really agreed with what Esq. Fascheti said about the ethical burden for bloggers.  Just a thought about the &quot;surprising&quot; nature of the decision, though: if the NYT loses a ten-million-dollar lawsuit, it pays, if the blogger loses, he/she just files bankruptcy.  I think that&#039;s a fair way to look at why the distinction exists in the way the NJ law is written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, really great update.  There seemed to be a lot of cases covered today.</p>
<p>One note: I really agreed with what Esq. Fascheti said about the ethical burden for bloggers.  Just a thought about the &#8220;surprising&#8221; nature of the decision, though: if the NYT loses a ten-million-dollar lawsuit, it pays, if the blogger loses, he/she just files bankruptcy.  I think that&#8217;s a fair way to look at why the distinction exists in the way the NJ law is written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
