<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com</link>
	<description>Offering CLE credit for California Lawyers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/3.0.1" -->
	<itunes:summary>Entertainment Lawyer Gordon Firemark&#039;s monthly roundup of entertainment law cases, news and commentary.  Continuing Legal Education credit available for California attorneys.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" />
	<copyright>Copyright 2011 Gordon P Firemark</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Monthly</itunes:subtitle>
	
	<itunes:category text="Business" />
		<rawvoice:rating>TV-G</rawvoice:rating>
		<rawvoice:frequency>monthly</rawvoice:frequency>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 30 &#8211; JOBS Act, crowdfunding, limited editions, and more.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/04/episode-30-jobs-act-crowdfunding-limited-editions-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/04/episode-30-jobs-act-crowdfunding-limited-editions-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube Magic Tricks &#8211; how to keep &#8216;em secret Art Collector v. Artist? and more&#8230; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 85px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law</li>
<li>Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube</li>
<li>Magic Tricks &#8211; how to keep &#8216;em secret</li>
<li>Art Collector v. Artist?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-856"></span></h2>
<h2>Hosts:</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/small.headshot.png"><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="small.headshot" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/small.headshot.png" alt="" width="108" height="150" /></a></p>
<h3>Gordon Firemark</h3>
<p>Websites:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark.com</a> , <a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/tamera.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="tamera" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/tamera.jpg" alt="" width="116" height="150" /></a></p>
<h3>Tamera Bennett</h3>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com<br />
</a>Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3> Guests</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="144" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Peter Kaufman</strong> joins us again for  this episode.</p>
<p>Website: <a href="http://dealfatigue.com/">http://dealfatigue.com<br />
</a>Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/dealfatigue">@dealfatigue</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Also with us, in the studio: <strong> Chris Blake</strong>, one of our interns, just completing his 2L year at Pepperdine Law.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Show Notes</h2>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"></h2>
<h2>CROWD-FUNDING AND THE JOBS ACT</h2>
<h3>JOBS ACT/CROWD-FINANCING</h3>
<p>Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">http</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">://</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">www</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">com</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">library</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">detail</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">aspx</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">?</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">g</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">ad</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">3</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">7</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">f</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">78-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">fc</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">57-4909-8</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">d</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">5</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">dd</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">9</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">ac</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">6</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">cc</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">6</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">ef</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7">7</a></p>
<p>Key points of the bill:</p>
<ul>
<li>Allows equity-based crowdfunding</li>
<li>Removes prohibitions on general solicitation of Regulation D offerings</li>
<li>Creates an IPO &#8220;on ramp&#8221; -</li>
<li>Increases threshold for Regulation A &#8220;mini public offerings&#8221;</li>
<li>Raises cap on private shareholders from 500 to 2,000</li>
</ul>
<h3>EFFECT ON FILM FINANCING</h3>
<p>Filmmaker Magazine: <a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">http</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">://</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">www</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">.</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">filmmakermagazine</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">.</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">com</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">/</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">news</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">/2012/04/</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">how</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">the</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">jobs</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">act</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">will</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">transform</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">independent</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">film</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">financing</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/">/</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>THEATRE: THE GODSPELL EXAMPLE</h3>
<p>NY Times: <a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">http</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">://</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">mobile</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">.</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">nytimes</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">.</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">com</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">/2012/04/19/</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">theater</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">/</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">for</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">-</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">godspell</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">-</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">on</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">-</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">broadway</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">-</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">crowd</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">-</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">sourced</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">-</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">producers</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">.</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">xml</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">?</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">single</a><a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1">=1</a></p>
<h2>VIACOM/YOUTUBE FOLLOW-UP</h2>
<p>Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">http</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">://</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">www</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">com</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">library</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">detail</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">aspx</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">?</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">g</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">=76982154-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">450-4</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">75-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">3</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">d</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">8-7</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">b</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">928</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">cbb</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">3865&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">source</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">medium</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">HTML</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">email</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Body</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Federal</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">section</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">campaign</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">subscriber</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">feed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">content</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">+2012-04-23&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">term</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=">=</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Link to Slip Opinion <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">http</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">://</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">www</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">.</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">ca</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">2.</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">uscourts</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">.</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">gov</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">decisions</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">isysquery</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">c</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">5792</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">ca</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">8-</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">db</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">37-4107-</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">b</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">0</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">f</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">7-67548</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">a</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">6</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">a</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">5</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">a</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">5</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">f</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/1/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">doc</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/10-3270_10-3342_</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">opn</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">.</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">pdf</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">#</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">xml</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">=</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">http</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">://</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">www</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">.</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">ca</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">2.</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">uscourts</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">.</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">gov</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">decisions</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">isysquery</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">c</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">5792</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">ca</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">8-</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">db</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">37-4107-</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">b</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">0</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">f</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">7-67548</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">a</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">6</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">a</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">5</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">a</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">5</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">f</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/1/</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">hilite</a><a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/">/</a></p>
<h2>Last Samurai &#8211; Copyright Script Jury Verdict</h2>
<p>THResq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">http</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">://</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">www</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">hollywoodreporter</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">com</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">thr</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">esq</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">last</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">samurai</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">zwick</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">herskovitz</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">win</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">lawsuit</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268">-309268</a></p>
<h2>Teller sues over magic trick reveal</h2>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">http</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">://</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">www</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">hollywoodreporter</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">com</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">thr</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">esq</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">penn</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">teller</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">lawsuit</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">reveal</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">secrets</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">youtube</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296">-312296</a></p>
<h2>Art Collector seeks to stop photographer from selling Digital Reprints</h2>
<p>Entertainment Law Matters: <a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">http</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">://</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">www</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">.</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">entertainmentlawmatters</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">.</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">com</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">/?</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">p</a><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119">=2119</a></p>
<h2>Tupac Hologram performs ‘live’ at Coachella Music Festival</h2>
<p>Billboard: <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">http</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">://</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">www</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">.</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">billboard</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">.</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">biz</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">/</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">bbbiz</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">/</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">industry</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">/</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">legal</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">and</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">management</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">/</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">tupac</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">coachella</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">hologram</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">very</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">unique</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">legally</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">-1006792552.</a><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story">story</a></p>
<h2>Amazon Studios revises terms for writers</h2>
<p>Filmmaker Magazine: <a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">http</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">://</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">www</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">.</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">filmmakermagazine</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">.</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">com</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">/</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">news</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">/2012/04/</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">amazon</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">studios</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">revises</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">terms</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">for</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">-</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">writers</a><a href="http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/">/</a></p>
<h2>Music royalty settlement announced on mechanical royalties</h2>
<p>Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">http</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">://</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">www</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">com</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">library</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">detail</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">aspx</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">?</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">g</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">=4</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">df</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">04006-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">8</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">f</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">1-428</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">be</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">5</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">b</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">-9</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">f</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">8</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">f</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">47935</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">9</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">goback</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">=%2</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">Egde</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">_2824501_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">member</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270">_109202270</a></p>
<p>Until next time&#8230;. that&#8217;s showbiz!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/04/episode-30-jobs-act-crowdfunding-limited-editions-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode030.mp3" length="71623301" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law   Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube   Magic Tricks - how to keep &#039;em secret   Art Collector v. Artist?   and more... </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)

Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	* Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law
	* Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube
	* Magic Tricks - how to keep &#039;em secret
	* Art Collector v. Artist?
	* and more...




(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg)Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com (http://www.goclio.com) and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio (http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio)

Hosts:
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/small.headshot.png)
Gordon Firemark
Websites:   http://firemark.com (http://firemark/) , http://theatrelawyer.com (http://theatrelawyer.com/),
Twitter: @gfiremark (http://twitter.com/gfiremark)

 

 

 

 

(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/tamera.jpg)
Tamera Bennett
Website:   http://createprotect.com
 (http://createprotect.com/)Twitter: @tamerabennett (http://twitter.com/tamerabennett)

 

 

 
 Guests
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail-200x300.jpg)

Peter Kaufman joins us again for  this episode.

Website: http://dealfatigue.com
 (http://dealfatigue.com/)Twitter: @dealfatigue (http://twitter.com/dealfatigue).

 

 

 

Also with us, in the studio:  Chris Blake, one of our interns, just completing his 2L year at Pepperdine Law.
Show Notes

CROWD-FUNDING AND THE JOBS ACT
JOBS ACT/CROWD-FINANCING
Lexology: http (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7):// (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)www (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7). (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)lexology (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7). (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)com (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)/ (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)library (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)/ (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)detail (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7). (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)aspx (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)? (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)g (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)= (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)ad (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)3 (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)e (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)7 (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)f (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)78- (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7)fc </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:14:16</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 29 &#8211; 360 deals, rights of publicity, and more</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: &#160; 360 Deals and the Talent Agencies Act More music sale vs. license litigation Copyright Termination update ReDigi injunction denied Aereo and retransmission fees and more. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;">360 Deals and the Talent Agencies Act</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">More music sale vs. license litigation</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Copyright Termination update</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">ReDigi injunction denied</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Aereo and retransmission fees</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">and more<span style="text-align: center;">.</span></li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-847"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<h3>Hosts:</h3>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark </a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<div>
<p><strong>  </strong></p>
<h3>Our Guest:</h3>
<p><strong>Erin Jacobson</strong> practices  in Los Angeles, California where she represents musicians, songwriters, producers, companies, and other entertainment professionals.  She has held several different positions in the music industry, including a stint as a DJ at USC’s campus radio station,  and in addition to  her transactional work music and entertainment, she also handles handles copyright and trademark issues for her clients in and around the industry.  She scored a great domain name&#8230;  Her Web site is at <a href="http://themusicindustrylawyer.com/">http://themusicindustrylawyer.com</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><strong>360 DEALS in conflict with the Talent Agencies Act</strong></p>
<p>TheMusicIndustryLawyer.com:   <a title="360 Deals and the California Talent Agencies Act:  Are Record Labels Procuring Employment?" href="http://www.sweetiestarr.com/articles/ErinMJacobsonEsq-360DealsArticle2011.pdf" target="_blank">“360 Deals and the California Talent Agencies Act:  Are Record Labels Procuring Employment? ” by: Erin M. Jacobson</a></p>
<p><strong>Sister Sledge and Kenny Rogers sue over license revenue share:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">THR-esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/sister-sledge-files-class-action-286903">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/sister-sledge-files-class-action-286903</a><br />
THR-esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/kenny-rogers-lawsuit-capitol-records-291388">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/kenny-rogers-lawsuit-capitol-records-291388</a></p>
<p><strong>Temptations Join Chorus of Lawsuits Over iTunes Royalties</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><strong></strong><br />
THREsq (3/15/2012): <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/temptations-itunes-lawsuits-300733">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/temptations-itunes-lawsuits-300733</a></p>
<p><strong>Running list of sale vs license lawsuits</strong>:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/recording-artists-suing-for-digital-royalty-accountings/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/recording-artists-suing-for-digital-royalty-accountings/</a></p>
<p><strong>Roger Miller Copyright Termination</strong></p>
<p>Lexology (3/5/2012): <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0184062b-dd76-434c-a96c-0b2c9024ea7e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-03-09&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0184062b-dd76-434c-a96c-0b2c9024ea7e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-03-09&amp;utm_term=</a></p>
<p>Decision: <a href="http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/12a0049p-06.pdf">http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/12a0049p-06.pdf</a></p>
<p><strong>YMCA Termination</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><strong></strong><br />
THREsq (3/22/2012): <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ymca-village-people-lawsuit-copyright-termination-303377">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ymca-village-people-lawsuit-copyright-termination-303377</a></p>
<p><strong>Drake sued by ex-GF:</strong></p>
<p>NY Daily News: <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music-arts/drake-sued-alleged-ex-girlfriend-marvin-room-royalties-article-1.1016669?localLinksEnabled=false">http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music-arts/drake-sued-alleged-ex-girlfriend-marvin-room-royalties-article-1.1016669?localLinksEnabled=false</a></p>
<p>THR-Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/drake-girlfriend-marvins-room-lawsuit-286916">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/drake-girlfriend-marvins-room-lawsuit-286916</a></p>
<h3 dir="ltr">FOLLOW-UPS</h3>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Variety Settles Long-Running Lawsuit Against L.A. Punk Band</strong></p>
<p dir="ltr">THREsq (2/13/2012): <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-lawsuit-vandals-punk-band-289700">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-lawsuit-vandals-punk-band-289700</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.vandals.com/Vandals/Variety_Vs._Vandals_Blog/Entries/2011/4/10_Federal_Justice_Sleet_Agrees_with_The_Vandals._Variety_Loses_First_Round%21.html">http://www.vandals.com/Vandals/Variety_Vs._Vandals_Blog/Entries/2011/4/10_Federal_Justice_Sleet_Agrees_with_The_Vandals._Variety_Loses_First_Round%21.html</a></p>
<p><strong>Judge Denies Efforts to Shut Down ReDigi</strong><br />
Hollywood Reporter (2/6/2012): <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/redigi-digital-music-lawsuit-287410">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/redigi-digital-music-lawsuit-287410</a></p>
<p><strong>Aereo sued over Broadcast Television Retransmission:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><strong></strong>Chicago Tribune: <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-201203201727reedbusivarietynvr1118051689mar20,0,3231770.story">http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-201203201727reedbusivarietynvr1118051689mar20,0,3231770.story</a><br />
Paul Weiss: <a href="http://www.paulweiss.com/files/Publication/996550c4-13ad-4a93-a375-5212822783ca/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/98133588-7295-4138-9d83-5492743e477f/CTD3-9-12.pdf#page=3">http://www.paulweiss.com/files/Publication/996550c4-13ad-4a93-a375-5212822783ca/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/98133588-7295-4138-9d83-5492743e477f/CTD3-9-12.pdf#page=3</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><strong>Marlon Brando Estate Wins Judgment Against Ashley Furniture:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">MarketWatch (2/6/2012): <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/marlon-brando-estate-wins-356000-judgment-in-federal-lawsuit-against-ashley-furniture-industries-inc-2012-02-06">http://www.marketwatch.com/story/marlon-brando-estate-wins-356000-judgment-in-federal-lawsuit-against-ashley-furniture-industries-inc-2012-02-06</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Shepard Fairey pleads guilty over Obama “Hope” image infringement</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><strong></strong>New York Times: <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/shepard-fairey-pleads-guilty-over-obama-hope-image/">http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/shepard-fairey-pleads-guilty-over-obama-hope-image/</a></p>
<p>Forbes:<br />
<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahelliott/2012/03/07/artist-shepard-fairey-pleads-guilty-in-criminal-case-could-face-prison-time/">http://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahelliott/2012/03/07/artist-shepard-fairey-pleads-guilty-in-criminal-case-could-face-prison-time/</a></p>
<p><strong>Julie Taymor Spider-Man update</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">LA Times: <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2012/03/julie-taymor-spider-man-producers.html">http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2012/03/julie-taymor-spider-man-producers.html</a><br />
New York Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/theater/spider-man-e-mails-revealed-in-taymor-lawsuit.html?_r=1&amp;hpw">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/theater/spider-man-e-mails-revealed-in-taymor-lawsuit.html?_r=1&amp;hpw</a><br />
Taymor’s Filing: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/83562006/taymor">http://www.scribd.com/doc/83562006/taymor</a><br />
THResq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/julie-taymor-spider-man-producers-motions-dismiss-lawsuits-303310">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/julie-taymor-spider-man-producers-motions-dismiss-lawsuits-303310</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Corbello v. DeVito: No copyright infringement if defendants have a valid sub-license</strong></p>
<p dir="ltr">Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0a9cd0d1-f928-4e5f-8caa-653c8c83258d">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0a9cd0d1-f928-4e5f-8caa-653c8c83258d</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">interested in the back story?</p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/beaumant-boy-battles-jersey-boys-joint-authors-of-copyrightable-work/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/beaumant-boy-battles-jersey-boys-joint-authors-of-copyrightable-work/</a></p>
<h3 dir="ltr">QUICK TAKES</h3>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Indiana Moves to Grand Broad New Legal Rights to Dead Celebrities</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/indiana-dead-celebrities-legal-rights-james-dean-law-288124">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/indiana-dead-celebrities-legal-rights-james-dean-law-288124</a></p>
<p><strong>Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity issues continue to plague CMG Worldwide</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marilyn-monroe-images-legal-dispute-303746">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marilyn-monroe-images-legal-dispute-303746</a></p>
<p><strong>Louis Vuitton Sends Cease and Desist to Penn Law</strong><br />
Law of Fashion: <a href="http://www.lawoffashion.com/blog/story/03/03/2012/121">http://www.lawoffashion.com/blog/story/03/03/2012/121</a><strong><br />
</strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode029.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>  Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: -    360 Deals and the Talent Agencies Act   More music sale vs. license litigation   Copyright Termination update   ReDigi injunction denied   Aereo and retransmission fees   and more.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)



 
Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

 

	360 Deals and the Talent Agencies Act
	More music sale vs. license litigation
	Copyri...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 28 &#8211; Political Campaigns, combat helicopters and Batmobiles.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode, we discuss political campaign uses of music, tv news clips, etc., We talk with a prominent Canadian entertainment lawyer about differences in copyright law, moral rights, fair use, and more.  Plus, a  look at several recent cases in the entertainment and media law fields.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;">Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">A Canadian Lawyer&#8217;s perspectives</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">MegaUpload</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Golan v. Holder  ruling</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Helicopters in video games&#8230; need a license?</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">and more</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em style="text-align: center;"></em><span style="text-align: center;">for this episode.</span></p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-825"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark </a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<div>
<p><strong>  </strong></p>
<p><strong>Bob Tarantino<br />
</strong>Blog: http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/<br />
email:  BTarantino@heenan.ca</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 107px"><a href="http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=1602"><img class="   " style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 25px;" title="Bob Tarantino" src="http://www.heenanblaikie.com/media/BioXML_Employees/photos/to_tarantino_b_72dpi_duotone.jpg" alt="" width="97" height="120" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bob Tarantino</p></div>
<p>Bob Tarantino is a partner in the Entertainment Law group at Heenan Blaikie LLP and focuses his practice on the interface between entertainment and intellectual property law. Bob has been recognized as one of Canada’s leading lawyers in the area of entertainment law in the 2010, 2011, and 2012 editions of The Best Lawyers in Canada (Woodward/White).  In 2010 he launched Heenan Blaikie&#8217;s Entertainment &amp; Media Law Signal, a collaborative blog by members of the firm&#8217;s Entertainment Law group, which was recognized as a co-winner of the Best New Law Blog in the 2010 Canadian Law Blog Awards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<h3>NEWT GINGRICH CAMPAIGN’S MUSIC COPYRIGHT ISSUES</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/newt-gingrich-eye-of-tiger-lawsuit-285913">Newt Gingrich’s campaign makes the news twice in a week for claims of copyright infringement of a song</a>.   Rude Music Inc., owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_the_Tiger"> song “Eye of the Tiger,”</a> filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal district court in Chicago for Gingrich’s use of the song on the campaign trail.</p>
</div>
<h4>CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW APPROACH TO SIMILAR SCENARIO</h4>
<p>The Newt Gingrich Campaign has been using the song, “How You Like Me Now” at campaign events. Third Side Music, a Montreal Record Label that controls the rights to the song sent Gingrich’s team a cease and desist order.</p>
<p>In the US, using a song at the public event requires securing a valid public performance license from ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. Beyond that, an artist does not have the ability to restrict the use of their song at a political event.</p>
<p>In Canada, the Canadian Copyright Act gives authors moral rights.</p>
<p>The author of a work has the right to the “integrity” of the work which is ingringed if the work is, to the “prejudice of the honor or reputation of the author, distorted, mutilated or otherwise modified; or used in association with a product, service, cause or institution (Section 14.1, Section 28.2).”</p>
<p>Thus, here, the use of the song in association with a cause (the campaign) prejudices the honor or reputation of the author and infringes his moral rights.</p>
<p>Third Side Music is the Canadian music publisher that controls the rights to the song.<br />
Bob’s blog post at Entertainment Media Signal: <a href="http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter">http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter</a></p>
<h3>MITT ROMNEY/NBC</h3>
<p>NBC’s lawyers have asked Romney to take out any reference to the network’s journalism in any other ads as well, but the campaign said it believes it falls under the fair-use doctrine and was reluctant to take the ad off.</p>
<h3>Megaupload Drops Lawsuit Against Universal Music Group</h3>
<p>THR-Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-universal-music-group-lawsuit-dropped-283767">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-universal-music-group-lawsuit-dropped-283767</a><br />
Wired.com: <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/youtube-universal-megaupload/">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/youtube-universal-megaupload/</a><br />
THR-Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-arrest-bail-sopa-284551">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-arrest-bail-sopa-284551</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>GOLAN V. HOLDER &#8211; SUPREME COURT RULING</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-ruling-foreign-copyright-laws-282931">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-ruling-foreign-copyright-laws-282931</a></p>
<p>The Supreme Court has handed down a long awaited decision. In a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Congress had the right to enter into the Uruguay Round Agreement which was an international treaty that allowed foreign rights-holders to claim copyright protection on some works that were previously in the public domain.</p>
<h3>EA Invokes First Amendment For Video Games</h3>
<p>Kotaku: <a href="http://kotaku.com/5874076/ea-invokes-first-amendment-protection-for-video-games-in-trademark-dispute-with-helicopter-maker">http://kotaku.com/5874076/ea-invokes-first-amendment-protection-for-video-games-in-trademark-dispute-with-helicopter-maker</a><br />
THR Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/battlefield-helicopters-video-games-280148">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/battlefield-helicopters-video-games-280148</a><br />
Gamasutra: <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/39540/EA_claims_free_speech_in_legal_dispute_over_helicopter_usage_in_Battlefield_3.php">http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/39540/EA_claims_free_speech_in_legal_dispute_over_helicopter_usage_in_Battlefield_3.php</a></p>
<p>Video game juggernaut Electronic Arts has filed suit against defense conglomerate Textron in California court.  At issue is EA’s right to depict three of Textron’s helicopters in the video game military simulation Battlefield 3.  Textron was allegedly threatening their own suit over trade dress infringement and dilution claims, which prompted the pre-emptive action by Electronic Arts.  EA is seeking a declaratory judgment allowing them to depict the three aircraft (the AH-1Z Viper, the UH-1Y transport helicopter, and the V-22 Osprey) on Fair Use and First Amendment grounds.</p>
<p>Compare: Use of “fictional car brands” in video games.  <a href="http://www.giantbomb.com/fictional-car-brands/92-5156/">http://www.giantbomb.com/fictional-car-brands/92-5156/</a></p>
<h3>Velvet Underground Sues Andy Warhol Foundation Over Famous Banana Album Cover</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/velvet-underground-andy-warhol-bananas-280603">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/velvet-underground-andy-warhol-bananas-280603</a></p>
<h3>UK Judge Orders Accused Copyright Pirate Extradited to US</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/tvshack-richard-odwyer-copyright-pirate-281455">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/tvshack-richard-odwyer-copyright-pirate-281455</a></p>
<p>Richard O’Dwyer, a 23-year old British resident has been ordered for extradition to the United States to face charges of copyright infringement for running a website that links to free films and tv shows.  Mr. O’Dwyer made thousands of British Pounds in advertising on the site.</p>
<p>The UK judge ruled that although the UK authorities are declining to litigate, the US authorities still have a right to try Mr. O’Dwyer in their jurisdiction.</p>
<h3>Just How Egregiously Must a Trademark Plaintiff Act Before a Court Awards Attorneys&#8217; Fees to the Defendant?&#8211;1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com</h3>
<p>Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog: <a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/its_really_hard.htm">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/its_really_hard.htm</a><br />
Link to case: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/78568762/1-800-Contacts-v-Lens-com-Denial-of-Attorneys-Fees">http://www.scribd.com/doc/78568762/1-800-Contacts-v-Lens-com-Denial-of-Attorneys-Fees</a></p>
<p>Section 1117 of the Lanham Act allows for recovery of attorneys’ fees in “exceptional” cases of trademark infringement.  On such case is 1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com. 1-800 Contacts sued their competitor in the Central District of Utah for infringement by competitive keyword advertising.</p>
<h3>Kim Kardashian v. The Gap:</h3>
<p>Yahoo: <a href="http://tv.yahoo.com/news/prepare-for-the-fight--the-gap-vs--kim-kardashian.html">http://tv.yahoo.com/news/prepare-for-the-fight&#8211;the-gap-vs&#8211;kim-kardashian.html</a><br />
Complaint: <a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2011cv05960/507477/1/">http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2011cv05960/507477/1/</a></p>
<p>A while back, Kim Kardashian filed suit against the Gap, the clothing retail giant which is the parent company of Old Navy, for using a supposed ‘Kim Kardashian look-a-like in one of the Old Navy commercials. Kardashian sued for $20 million claiming that the commercial “created confusion in the marketplace and violated her rights to her name and likeness.”</p>
<p>Now, The Gap is fighting back, arguing that Kardashian’s reputation was not actually damaged by the commercial.</p>
<h3>Batmobile Design IS protectable by copyright.  Not a &#8220;Useful Article&#8221;</h3>
<p>Last year, DC Comics, a subsidiary of Warner Bros., sued Mark Towles, who operated a business called &#8220;Gotham Garage,&#8221; which sold imitation batmobiles. DC, accused Towles of violating its copyright and trademark and confusing the public into thinking that his cars were authorized products.</p>
<p>U.S. District Judge Ronald Lew, rejected Towles’ argument that a BatMobile is a useful article, not protected by copyright.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/qchZSWToIFw/dark-knight-rises-batmobile-justin%20bieber-286212">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/qchZSWToIFw/dark-knight-rises-batmobile-justin%20bieber-286212</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/80072393">BATMOBILE CASE:  Order denying Defense Motion to Dismiss</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode028.mp3" length="65235910" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we discuss political campaign uses of music, tv news clips, etc., We talk with a prominent Canadian entertainment lawyer about differences in copyright law, moral rights, fair use, and more.  Plus,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)



 
Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

 

	Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters
	A Canadian Lawyer&#039;s perspectives
	MegaUpload
	Golan v. Holder  ruling
	Helicopters in video games... need a license?
	and more

GET CLE CREDIT (http://cle-podcasts.com/store) for this episode.

(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg)Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com (http://www.goclio.com) and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio (http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio)
Show Notes
Hosts:
Gordon P. Firemark
Website:   http://firemark  (http://firemark/)http://theatrelawyer.com (http://theatrelawyer.com/),
Twitter: @gfiremark (http://twitter.com/gfiremark)
Tamera Bennett

Website:   http://createprotect.com (http://createprotect.com/)
Twitter: @tamerabennett (http://twitter.com/tamerabennett)


  

Bob Tarantino
Blog: http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/
email:  BTarantino@heenan.ca



Bob Tarantino is a partner in the Entertainment Law group at Heenan Blaikie LLP and focuses his practice on the interface between entertainment and intellectual property law. Bob has been recognized as one of Canada’s leading lawyers in the area of entertainment law in the 2010, 2011, and 2012 editions of The Best Lawyers in Canada (Woodward/White).  In 2010 he launched Heenan Blaikie&#039;s Entertainment &amp; Media Law Signal, a collaborative blog by members of the firm&#039;s Entertainment Law group, which was recognized as a co-winner of the Best New Law Blog in the 2010 Canadian Law Blog Awards.

 

 

NEWT GINGRICH CAMPAIGN’S MUSIC COPYRIGHT ISSUES
Newt Gingrich’s campaign makes the news twice in a week for claims of copyright infringement of a song (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/newt-gingrich-eye-of-tiger-lawsuit-285913).   Rude Music Inc., owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the song “Eye of the Tiger,” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_the_Tiger) filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal district court in Chicago for Gingrich’s use of the song on the campaign trail.


CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW APPROACH TO SIMILAR SCENARIO
The Newt Gingrich Campaign has been using the song, “How You Like Me Now” at campaign events. Third Side Music, a Montreal Record Label that controls the rights to the song sent Gingrich’s team a cease and desist order.

In the US, using a song at the public event requires securing a valid public performance license from ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. Beyond that, an artist does not have the ability to restrict the use of their song at a political event.

In Canada, the Canadian Copyright Act gives authors moral rights.

The author of a work has the right to the “integrity” of the work which is ingringed if the work is, to the “prejudice of the honor or reputation of the author, distorted, mutilated or otherwise modified; or used in association with a product, service, cause or institution (Section 14.1, Section 28.2).”

Thus, here, the use of the song in association with a cause (the campaign) prejudices the honor or reputation of the author and infringes his moral rights.

Third Side Music is the Canadian music publisher that controls the rights to the song.
Bob’s blog post at Entertainment Media Signal: http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:13:04</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 27 &#8211; Top 10 Stories of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round up of 2011's top entertainment, copyright, trademark and media law stories.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;">&#8220;Santa Claus Is Coming to town&#8221; Copyright termination</li>
<li><span style="text-align: center;">9th Circuit upholds DMCA Safe Harbor for VEOH</span></li>
<li><span style="text-align: center;">Our Top Ten Stories of 2011</span></li>
<li><span style="text-align: center;">Predictions for 2012</span></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em style="text-align: center;"></em><span style="text-align: center;">for this episode.</span></p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-815"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark </a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">NEW CASES</h2>
<p><strong></strong><strong><br />
Songwriter’s estate wants control over ‘Santa Claus is coming to town’<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899</a><br />
Link to Complaint: <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf">http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf</a></strong></p>
<p>Veoh is shielded by the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779</a><br />
Link to decision: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777">http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong></strong><strong>TOP 10 STORIES OF 2011</strong></h2>
<div><strong></strong><strong><br />
10.  NCAA Athlete Likeness Litigation<br />
Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=">www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_&#8230;</a><br />
</strong></div>
<p dir="ltr">Link to Opinion:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t">http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t</a></p>
<p><strong>9. Cariou v. Prince<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince">http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince</a><br />
<a href="http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html">http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html</a><br />
<a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html</a></strong></p>
<p>8. Hangover 2<br />
<a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/05/tattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html">Tattoo Law: Can &#8216;Hangover 2&#8242; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#8217; Character?</a><br />
<a href="http://offthebench.nbcsports.com/2011/04/29/tysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement | Off the Bench</a><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303</a><br />
The Guardian: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true">http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true</a></p>
<p>7. Wizard of Oz<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446</a></p>
<p>6. Betty Boop (Fleischer v. AVELA)<br />
Lexology: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y</a></p>
<p>5. Brown v. EMA<br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827</a></p>
<p>4. Tenenbaum (&amp; Jammie Thomas)<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/music-pirate-argues-67500-penalty-68154">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/music-pirate-argues-67500-penalty-68154</a></p>
<p>3.  Golan v. Holder</p>
<p>2. Righthaven<br />
Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok"> http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok</a><br />
Vegas Inc.:<a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/"> http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/</a></p>
<p>1. UMG cases (starting with Eminmen, Rob Zombie, Chuck D)<br />
<a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/</a></p>
<p>NEW FILING</p>
<p>And now in line with the UMG cases, the My Sharona filing:<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/knack-bruce-gary-sister-sues-my-sharona-itunes-amazon-276149">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/knack-bruce-gary-sister-sues-my-sharona-itunes-amazon-276149</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode027.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Round up of 2011&#039;s top entertainment, copyright, trademark and media law stories.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)



 
Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

 

	&quot;Santa Claus Is Coming to town&quot; Copyright termination
	* 9th Circuit upholds DMCA Safe Harbor for VEOH
	* Our Top Ten Stories of 2011
	* Predictions for 2012

 

 

 

 

GET CLE CREDIT (http://cle-podcasts.com/store) for this episode.
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg)Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com (http://www.goclio.com) and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio (http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio)
Show Notes
Hosts:
Gordon P. Firemark
Website:   http://firemark  (http://firemark/)http://theatrelawyer.com (http://theatrelawyer.com/),
Twitter: @gfiremark (http://twitter.com/gfiremark)
Tamera Bennett

Website:   http://createprotect.com (http://createprotect.com/)
Twitter: @tamerabennett (http://twitter.com/tamerabennett)

NEW CASES

Songwriter’s estate wants control over ‘Santa Claus is coming to town’
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899)
Link to Complaint: http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf (http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf)

Veoh is shielded by the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779)
Link to decision: http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777 (http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777)

 
TOP 10 STORIES OF 2011

10.  NCAA Athlete Likeness Litigation
Lexology: www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_... (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=)

Link to Opinion:http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t (http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t)
9. Cariou v. Prince
http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince (http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince)
http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html (http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html)
http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html (http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html)

8. Hangover 2
Tattoo Law: Can &#039;Hangover 2&#039; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#039; Character? (http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/05/tattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html)
Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement | Off the Bench (http://offthebench.nbcsports.com/2011/04/29/tysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303)
The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true (http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true)

7. Wizard of Oz
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:12:11</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 26 &#8211; Attack of the Little Trees!</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/12/episode-26-attack-of-the-little-trees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/12/episode-26-attack-of-the-little-trees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest Peter Kaufman joins hosts Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett for this roundup of legal news and opinion covering the fields of Film, Television, Music, Theatre, Copyright, Trademark and Internet law.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>PROTECT IP /SOPA</li>
<li>CROWD FUNDING BILL</li>
<li>Ghost Hunters &#8211; Cert Denied</li>
<li>Rob Zombie Class Action moves toward class certification</li>
<li>Viacom/ YouTube case sees extraordinary order</li>
<li>Grooveshark sued by UMG</li>
<li>Sound Recording Copyright Terminations begin</li>
<li>Who owns &#8220;La Dolce Vita&#8221;</li>
<li>Does Eastland records have a 50/50 chance in court?</li>
<li>Car Freshner v. Getty Images &#8211; attack of the little trees</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-792"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: bold;">Hosts:  </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #000000;"> </span></a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #000000;">,</span><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">Guest:<br />
<strong></strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-803" style="border-width: 2px; border-color: black; border-style: solid; margin: 10px;" title="PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="180" /></a>Peter Kaufman</strong> of the <strong>Kaufman Entertainment Law Group</strong> in Los Angeles joins us in this episode.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Peter practices in the fields of film, television, music and intellectual property.  He is an Arbitrator for the Independent Film and Television Alliance,  and a member of the Academy of Television Arts &amp; Sciences.   He is also a frequent speaker in the United States and abroad including USC’s School of Cinema Arts, CeBit – Germany, the Atlas Film and TV Finance Conference and the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s yearly symposia on entertainment law. Mr. Kaufman is the former chair of the Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> Read Peter’s blog at <a href="http://dealfatigue.com/">http://dealfatigue.com</a>, and follow him on twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/dealfatigue">@dealfatigue</a>.</p>
<hr />
<h2>PENDING LEGISLATION</h2>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>Protect IP Act and Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)</strong>:</div>
<p>Ars Technica, Proposed Law: <a href="http://static.arstechnica.net/2011/10/26/SOPA.pdf">http://static.arstechnica.net/2011/10/26/SOPA.pdf</a></p>
<p>Public Knowledge: <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/what-warners-recklessness-says-about-sopa">http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/what-warners-recklessness-says-about-sopa</a></p>
<p>Warner Bros. response: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/warner-bros-admits-sending-hotfile-false-takedown-requests-111109/">http://torrentfreak.com/warner-bros-admits-sending-hotfile-false-takedown-requests-111109/</a></p>
<p>Brief Summary of the Proposed Law</p>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p dir="ltr">PROTECT IP Act (short for Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011)  was introduced on May 12, 2011 by Senator Patrick Leahy.  It is a rewriting of the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA).  The House version of the bill, the &#8220;Stop Online Piracy Act&#8221; (SOPA) was proposed on October 26, 2011.</p>
<p>The Bill(s):</p>
<ul>
<li>Create a private cauise of action against sites that are “dedicated to the theft of U.S. Property”</li>
<li>Allows the DOJ  stop payments and advertising on such sites.</li>
<li>Bars search engines from linking to those sites, as well as ordering domain name services to de-list the sites.</li>
<li>Grants immunity to those who report such infringing sites</li>
</ul>
<p>CAUTIONARY TALE:</p>
<p>Warner Bros. has admitted to abusing its DMCA takedown rights in another context&#8230; what’s to stop them and others like them from abusing this law’s mechanism  to take down entire sites?</p>
<p><strong>CROWD FUNDING REGULATIONS</strong></p>
<p>WSJ: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203707504577008021536730062.html?KEYWORDS=crowd-funding">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203707504577008021536730062.html?KEYWORDS=crowd-funding</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">On November 3, 2011, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act, H.R. 2930. The bill will allow an SEC registration exemption for crowd-funding, whereby entrepreneurs could raise up to $2 million in equity from individual investors, but must provide audited financial statements if the total money raised exceeds $1 million.</p>
<h2 dir="ltr">FOLLOW &#8211; UPS</h2>
<p><strong>SUPREME COURT NIXES GHOST HUNTERS CASE</strong></p>
<p>Variety: <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118045749">http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118045749</a></p>
<p>The U.S. Supreme court has denied the defense’s petition for cert on the question whether Copyright law pre-empts state law breach of implied contract and breach of confidence claims.  Earlier this year, the 9th circuit ruled that it does NOT.  So&#8230;The case now heads back to the district court for trial.</p>
<p><strong>UNIVERSAL MUSIC LOSES BID TO DISMISS CLASS ACTION OVER DIGITAL REVENUE (ROB ZOMBIE/RICK JAMES)</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-lawsuit-rob-zombie-rick-james-256662">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-lawsuit-rob-zombie-rick-james-256662</a></p>
<p>UMG claims that digital downloads and ringtones should be classified as “sales,” garnering the artist a 10-20 percent royalty rate.  Rob Zombie, etc. claim that they should be classified as “licenses,” which would be closer to a 50/50 split.</p>
<p><strong>VIACOM/YOUTUBE</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/youtube-viacom-appeal-lawsuit-258734">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/youtube-viacom-appeal-lawsuit-258734</a>; <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/viacom-youtube-interpretation-copyright-law-260192">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/viacom-youtube-interpretation-copyright-law-260192</a><br />
TechDirt: <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/12320516711/viacom-says-that-letting-people-view-videos-phones-youtube-loses-dmca-safe-harbors.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/12320516711/viacom-says-that-letting-people-view-videos-phones-youtube-loses-dmca-safe-harbors.shtml</a></p>
<p>The 2nd Circuit now hearing the case issued an extraordinary order asking both sides to comment further on the “red flag” provisions in the DMCA.</p>
</div>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">CASES TO WATCH</h2>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP SUES GROOVESHARK</strong></div>
<p>THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-grooveshark-copyright-lawsuit-263714">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-grooveshark-copyright-lawsuit-263714</a></p>
<p>Digital Music News: <a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2011/111123grooveshark?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2011/111123grooveshark?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter</a></p>
<p>Direct Link to Complaint: <a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/uploads/b9/82/b9829ebb37bd5f1a25fc839df6ea6db7/grooveshark.pdf">http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/uploads/b9/82/b9829ebb37bd5f1a25fc839df6ea6db7/grooveshark.pdf</a></p>
<p>UMG contends that Grooveshark is a “pirate website” that streams unauthorized copyrighted material to its users (reportedly 600 million minutes a month to 30 million unique users).</p>
<p dir="ltr">The interesting twist in this case is that UMG also accuses Grooveshark employees, by name, including the CEO and other senior executives, of uploading over 113,000 unauthorized songs to the site.</p>
<p>Chart detailing the alleged song uploads by Grooveshark employees -<br />
<a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/legal/grooveshark2.jpg">http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/legal/grooveshark2.jpg</a></p>
<p><strong>First Sound Recording Copyright Termination Suit Filed</strong></p>
<p>Lommen Abdo: <a href="http://www.lommen.com/Firm-News/Legal-Headlines/Termination-of-Copyright-Transfers.aspx">http://www.lommen.com/Firm-News/Legal-Headlines/Termination-of-Copyright-Transfers.aspx</a></p>
<p>Practice Point: If you have a client who is a legacy songwriter or recording artist and who signed an agreement in 1978 or shortly after, now would be a good time to review those prior agreements and catalogs and serve notices of termination under the U.S. Copyright Act. Failure to do so may result in the loss of valuable reversion rights.</p>
<p><strong>PARAMOUNT SUES FOR OWNERSHIP OF LA DOLCE VITA</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/paramount-sues-fellini-la-dolce-vita-257681">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/paramount-sues-fellini-la-dolce-vita-257681</a></p>
<p>Paramount filed a complaint in California federal court against International Media Films, who also claims to be the valid copyright owner of La Dolce Vita.  Both claim ownership through a convoluted chain of title. The outcome of the Golan v. Holder case might make Paramount’s claim moot. If the Supreme Court restores copyrighted works to the public domain, including La Dolce Vita, then no one actually would have a valid copyright in the film and it would be in the public domain.</p>
<p><strong>MUSIC LABEL SUES DEMANDING ‘50/50’ DISTRIBUTORS CHANGE FILM TITLE</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/50-50-movie-seth-rogen-lawsuit-263572">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/50-50-movie-seth-rogen-lawsuit-263572</a><br />
50/50 TM info: <a href="http://www.trademarks411.com/marks/78228773-phifty-50">http://www.trademarks411.com/marks/78228773-phifty-50</a></p>
<p>Eastland Music Group filed the federal lawsuit in Illinois claiming it has been using the 50/50 mark since 2000 in connection with entertainment services and products. As evidence, they point to its website, phifty-50.com (fifty spelled with a “ph”), which currently has a sign post on its front page adorned with “50/50” (fifty slash fifty like the film title).</p>
<p>They are demanding a permanent injunction against use of the title, the destruction of all products where &#8220;50-50&#8243; is affixed, and an award of all of the film&#8217;s sales and revenues as a result of the alleged infringement.</p>
<p><strong>CAR FRESHNER TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CASE</strong>:</p>
<p>Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ffd801cb-72c3-49fb-bd23-5ff8df0daf9b">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ffd801cb-72c3-49fb-bd23-5ff8df0daf9b</a></p>
<p>Link to decision: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/67629206/Decision-Tree-Freshner-Getty">http://www.scribd.com/doc/67629206/Decision-Tree-Freshner-Getty</a></p>
<p>The Car Freshner Corporation, maker of that tree-shaped, rear-view mirror hanging car air freshener is suing Getty Images for trademark infringement over a number of images in its stock photo inventory that include a tree-shaped air freshener.</p>
<p>Getty filed a motion to dismiss but in late October 2011, the court denied that motion. The opinion reads: “after reviewing the images on Defendants’ website containing the Tree Marks, the Court finds plausible the allegation that a purchaser and/or user of Defendants’ images could be confused as to the source of origin of the images, believing incorrectly that ‘they originate from, are sponsored by, are approved by, or in someway are affiliated with Plaintiffs.’”</p>
<h2 dir="ltr">NEW FILINGS TO WATCH OUT FOR</h2>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>CAPITOL RECORDS v. DEFRIES</strong></div>
<p>Jason Pascal, VP of The Orchard, brought our attention to this complaint,  filed in the SDNY. The former manager of David Bowie, Mick Ronson and others seems to be taking the position that anyone meeting what he deems to be a co-author has a right to non-exclusively license the whole master.  Consequently, via his relationship with the  Ronson estate, he digitally released Pin-Ups by David Bowie, American Fool by John Mellencamp, Bad Company by Bad Company, Transformer by Lou Reed, and several others.  All of these titles had performances by Mick Ronson and the defendant is claiming he is a co-author.  The record labels  finally sued.</p>
<p><strong>TAYMOR v. Eight Legged Productions, LLC</strong></p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong></strong><br />
Playwright and Director Julie Taymor, who earlier this year was replaced on the beleaguered production of Spiderman, has filed suit against the shows’ producers and her co-writer alleging breach of contract unfair competition, and copyright claims relating to the show’s use of material she created in subsequent productions and tours without her approval, and for failure to pay royalties due.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Do us a favor (ok, 3):</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<ul>
<li>Subscribe in iTunes, or your favorite music software.</li>
<li>Give us a review</li>
<li>Tell your friends about our show!</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Follow us on twitter. Just follow <a href="http://twitter.com/entlawupdate">@entlawupdate</a> and you&#8217;ll be notified about our episodes as they become available. We also tweet about our upcoming topics, when we&#8217;re looking for guests, and so on., so if you have topics you think we should cover, please feel free to send us your ideas, suggestions, etc.</div>
<p dir="ltr">And of course, you can email us.  The address is <a href="mailto:entertainmentlawupdate@gmail.com">entertainmentlawupdate@gmail.com</a>. and our listener, voice-feedback phone line is 310-243-6231</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/12/episode-26-attack-of-the-little-trees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode026.mp3" length="59990436" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Guest Peter Kaufman joins hosts Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett for this roundup of legal news and opinion covering the fields of Film, Television, Music, Theatre, Copyright, Trademark and Internet law.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)


Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	* PROTECT IP /SOPA
	* CROWD FUNDING BILL
	* Ghost Hunters - Cert Denied
	* Rob Zombie Class Ac...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:12:11</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 025 &#8211; What&#8217;s with all the Zombies?</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monthly roundup of entertainment law news and case briefs from Entertainment Lawyers Gordon P. Firemark and Tamera Bennett]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Zombie Righthaven</li>
<li>Golan v. Holder at the USSC</li>
<li>Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity?</li>
<li>ReDigi &#8211; digital music first sale doctrine?</li>
<li>Poison gets sued 25 years after infringement</li>
<li>Costumes and copyright?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-786"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<div>
<h3 dir="ltr">FOLLOW &#8211; UPS</h3>
<p><strong>Righthaven &#8212; almost dead, but not quite</strong><br />
Vegas Inc.: <a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/">http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/</a></p>
<p><strong>Hollywood eyes fate of copyright law (Golan v. Holder update)</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-argument-copyright-public-domain-244528">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-argument-copyright-public-domain-244528</a></p>
<p>Link to mp3 of the entire oral argument:<a href="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_545"> http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_545</a></p>
<p><strong>Public Domain Info Project</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.pdinfo.com/">http://www.pdinfo.com/ </a></p>
<p><strong>Middle Tennessee State University Center for Popular Music:</strong><br />
<a href="http://popmusic.mtsu.edu/">http://popmusic.mtsu.edu/</a></p>
<p><strong>Monroe Publicity Rights </strong><br />
Law360: <a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/276881?nl_pk=26cb3b47-8864-4d65-9661-d1383057df81&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/276881</a></p>
<p><strong>George Clinton dispute regarding digital downloads.</strong><br />
<a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/</a></p>
<p><strong>ReDigi &#8211; can you legally resell your music?</strong><br />
TechCrunch: <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/14/what-if-you-could-legally-resell-your-digital-music-redigi-may-have-found-the-solution/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/14/what-if-you-could-legally-resell-your-digital-music-redigi-may-have-found-the-solution/</a></p>
<p><strong>Does Warner Bros. Really Have Exclusive Movie Rights to a Story Posted on Reddit?</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/does-warner-bros-have-movie-250726">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/does-warner-bros-have-movie-250726</a><br />
<strong>Can MTV Sue New Jersey For Nixing &#8216;Jersey Shore&#8217; Tax Credit?</strong><br />
NY Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christie-blocks-tax-credit-for-jersey-shore.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christie-blocks-tax-credit-for-jersey-shore.html</a><br />
THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/can-mtv-sue-new-jersey-shore-241609">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/can-mtv-sue-new-jersey-shore-241609</a><br />
NJ.com: <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/gov_christie_vetoes_jersey_sho.html">http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/gov_christie_vetoes_jersey_sho.html</a></p>
<p><strong>80’s Hair Band Poison sued for allegedly stealing songs twenty-five years ago</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/hair-band-war-did-poison-steal-80s-hits-1005429832.story">http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/hair-band-war-did-poison-steal-80s-hits-1005429832.story</a></p>
<p><strong>Could Ben Affleck be liable for The Town-inspired robberies?</strong><br />
FindLaw: <a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/10/can-ben-affleck-be-liable-for-the-town-nyc-robberies.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_elegal">http://blogs.findlaw.com</a><br />
FindLaw: <a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20030602.html">http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20030602.html</a></p>
<p><strong>Power Rangers Halloween Costumes &#8211; Can They Be Copyrighted?</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/power-rangers-halloween-costumes-morph-254742">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/power-rangers-halloween-costumes-morph-254742</a></p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Hurt Locker&#8217; Case Dismissed on Anti-Slapp motion</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/read-judges-decision-hurt-locker-248276?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/read-judges-decision-hurt-locker-248276?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter</a><br />
Casp.net: <a href="http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/">http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/</a></p>
<p><strong>Man claims that The Hangover II was based on his life story</strong><br />
THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303</a></p>
<p><strong>Quarterback’s suit against EA dismissed</strong><br />
Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=01d5c62d-8f1b-4596-a958-2600b5efc96f&amp;utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2011-10-13&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Actress Sues iMDB for revealing age</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-sued-imdb-identity-250664">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-sued-imdb-identity-250664</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpsiode025mp3.mp3" length="59643571" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Monthly roundup of entertainment law news and case briefs from Entertainment Lawyers Gordon P. Firemark and Tamera Bennett</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)


Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	* Zombie Righthaven
	* Golan v. Holder at the USSC
	* Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity?
	* Re...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 024 &#8211; Wronghaven, Immaterial Girls &amp; Noodle Bowls</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/09/episode-024-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/09/episode-024-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode:

Righthaven is wrong... even more
$10 infringement settlements
Tenenbaum award reinstated
Indies sue Limewire
Betty Boop ruling revised
Material Girl trademark suit proceeds
You can't copyright food]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; even more</li>
<li>$10 infringement settlements</li>
<li>Tenenbaum award reinstated</li>
<li>Indies sue Limewire</li>
<li>Betty Boop ruling revised</li>
<li>Material Girl trademark suit proceeds</li>
<li>You can&#8217;t copyright food</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-776"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>The end of Righthaven?</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Wired: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">://</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">www</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">wired</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">com</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">threatlevel</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medianews</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">righthaven</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">dumb</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">idea</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/?</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitterfeed</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitter</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">ArsTechnica: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">://</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">arstechnica</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">com</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">tech</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">policy</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">news</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">righthaven</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">copyright</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">suits</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">tossed</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">in</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">colorado</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">too</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">ars</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">?</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">campaign</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitterfeed</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitter</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>Law firm offers $10 settlements to music copyright infringers</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT"> PaidContent: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">http</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">://</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">paidcontent</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">.</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">org</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">article</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/419-10-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">settlement</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">offers</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">the</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">entertainment</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">industrys</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">new</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">copyright</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">tactic</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/</a></span></span></p>
<p><strong>Court Upholds $675 Judgment Against Joel Tenenbaum</strong></p>
<p>FindLaw: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">http</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">://</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">blogs</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">findlaw</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">com</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">/</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">first</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">_</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">circuit</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">circuit</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">reinstates</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-675000-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">judgment</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">against</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">joel</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">tenenbaum</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">html</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">?=</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">features</a></span></span></p>
<p>Goldman blog: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">http</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">://</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">blog</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">ericgoldman</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">org</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">/</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">archives</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">/2011/09/1</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">st</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">_</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">circuit</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">_</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">rei</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">htm</a></span></span></p>
<p>Order: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">http</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">://</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">docs</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">docstoc</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">com</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">/</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">pdf</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">/29137/470628</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">a</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">6-</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">a</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">507-41</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">ce</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">-8</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">cbd</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">-0309210</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">c</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">748</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">e</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>Independent Labels Sue LimeWire for their Share of Settlement</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">/695</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">vmhy</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Saregama</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">v</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">. </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Timbaland</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">, </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">et</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">al</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">.</a></strong></span></span><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Case</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">No</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">. 10-10626 (11</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">th</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Cir</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">., </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">March</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf"> 25, 2011)?</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>2nd Cir. Will Hear Richard Prince’s Photo Use Appeal</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Law360: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">http</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">://</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">www</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">.</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">law</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">360.</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">com</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">ip</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">articles</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/271962</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">NYTimes: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">http</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">://</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">artsbeat</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">blogs</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">nytimes</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">com</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">/2011/09/15/</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">court</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">allows</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">richard</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">prince</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">to</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">appeal</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">copyright</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">decision</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">/</a></span></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Betty Boop no longer threat to Detroit Lions, Princeton Tigers, or Yogi Bear — oh my!</span></strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">/3</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">ttgb</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">2</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">y</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Opinion: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">http</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">://</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">www</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">ca</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">9.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">uscourts</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">gov</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">datastore</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">opinions</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/2011/08/19/09-56317.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"> &#8217;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: x-small;">Cause we are living in a material world! But it doesn&#8217;t belong to Madonna!</span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">http</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">://</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">www</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">com</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">library</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">detail</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">aspx</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">?</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">g</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">6</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">58</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">d</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">7</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">-83</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">ae</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">-45</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">3-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">353-32</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">f</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">5</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">fa</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">48741</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">source</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">medium</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">HTML</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">email</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Body</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Federal</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">section</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">campaign</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">subscriber</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">feed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">content</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+2011-09-20&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">term</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a></span></span></p>
<p>THREsq: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">http</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">://</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">www</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">hollywoodreporter</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">com</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">thr</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">esq</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">judge</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">rejects</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">madonnas</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">trademark</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">claim</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-231562</a></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><span style="font-size: x-small;">Ninth Circuit adopts lower court’s use of its own &#8220;blades of chaos&#8221; to filter out the unprotectable elements of a plaintiff’s copyright infringement claim</span></h1>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">/4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">yv</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">68</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">kl</a></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>You can&#8217;t copyright a bowl of food</strong></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"> KIM SENG COMPANY v J&amp;A IMPORTERS, INC., ET AL.</p>
<p align="LEFT"> Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">/3</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">hgcagh</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Decision: <a href="http://iplawwatch.foxrothschild.com/uploads/file/seng742.pdf"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">http://iplawwatch.foxrothschild.com/uploads/file/seng742.pdf</span></span></a></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="color: #3e3d40;">Cases mentioned:</span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Feist</a> <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Publ</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">&#8216;</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">ns</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">, </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Inc</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Rural</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Tel</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Serv</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Co</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">., 499 </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">U</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">.</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">S</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. 340, 361 (1991)</a></span>.</p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Satava</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lowry</a></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lamps</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Plus</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">, </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Inc</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Seattle</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lighting</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Fixture</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Co</a></span>. I</p>
<h4 align="CENTER">Quick-Takes</h4>
<p><strong>EU Adds 20 years to Music Copyrights</strong></p>
<p>Ars: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">/4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">y</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">lojz</a></span></span></p>
<p>EU Directive: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">https</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">://</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">www</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">consilium</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">europa</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">eu</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">uedocs</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">cms</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">_</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">data</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">docs</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">pressdata</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">en</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">intm</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/124570.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<h4 align="CENTER">New Filings</h4>
<p><strong>Deadline’s Parent Company Sues THR’s Parent Company for Copyright Infringement</strong></p>
<p>LA Times: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">http</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">://</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">latimesblogs</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">latimes</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">com</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">/</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">entertainmentnewsbuzz</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">deadline</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">hollywood</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">reporter</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">lawsuit</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">html</a></span></span></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=23a81528-f24d-4e60-a6c0-6596b7ad5fe8" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/09/episode-024-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode024.mp3" length="64003963" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>copyright,Intellectual Property,law</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode: - Righthaven is wrong... even more $10 infringement settlements Tenenbaum award reinstated Indies sue Limewire Betty Boop ruling revised Material Girl trademark suit proceeds You can&#039;t copyright food</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)


Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	* Righthaven is wrong... even more
	* $10 infringement settlements
	* Tenenbaum award reinstated
	* Indies sue Limewire
	* Betty Boop ruling revised
	* Material Girl trademark suit proceeds
	* You can&#039;t copyright food

GET CLE CREDIT (http://cle-podcasts.com/store) for this episode.

 
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg)Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com (http://www.goclio.com) and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio (http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio)
Show Notes
The end of Righthaven?
Wired: http (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter):// (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)www (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter). (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)wired (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter). (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)com (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)/ (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)threatlevel (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)/2011/09/ (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)medianews (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)- (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)righthaven (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)- (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)dumb (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)- (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)idea (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)/? (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)utm (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)_ (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)source (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)= (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)twitterfeed (http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter)&amp; </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELU Episode 023 &#8211; Monkeying Around with Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This latest episode of Entertainment Law Update Podcast is now available.  Please visit our Web site to listen, or subscribe and download using iTunes, Android or your preferred podcatcher.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; again, and again, and again&#8230;.</li>
<li>Disney Appeals  &#8221;Millionaire&#8221; verdict</li>
<li>Wizard of Oz film characters still protected</li>
<li>First Sale doesn&#8217;t apply to imported goods</li>
<li>Monkeying around with copyright</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em></em>f or this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-771"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Follow Ups</span></p>
<div><strong>Righthaven suffers three strikes in one week</strong><br />
Lexology: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok">http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok</a>The cases in question:</div>
<div>Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC, 2011 WL 2378186 (D. Nev. June 14, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.);Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, 2011 WL 2441020 (D. Nev. June 20, 2011) (Philip M. Pro, J.);Righthaven LLC v. DiBiase, Case No. 2:10-cv-01343-RLH-PAL, Order (D. Nev. June 22, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.).</p>
<p><a href="http://media.lasvegassun.com/media/pdfs/blogs/documents/2011/04/15/rhavenstrategicalliance.pdf">Link to Strategic Alliance Agreement.</a></p>
<p><strong>Disney Appeals $319 Million &#8216;Millionaire&#8217; Verdict</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538</a></p>
<p><strong>Jack Kirby appeals loss in Marvel copyright lawsuit</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">=====================</p>
<h4 dir="ltr">Feature Stories</h4>
<p><strong>Warner Bros. Wins Key Legal Ruling Impacting All &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Remakes</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255</a><br />
Link to decision:<a href="http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR"> http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR</a></p>
<p>If you’re interested in reading the entire decision, the case is called Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v.  X One X Productions.</p>
<p><a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/188/239/case.html">Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company</a>, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the<br />
U.S. Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright"> copyright. </a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Copyright owners win broader rights for works made abroad Thompson Reuters:</strong><a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/"> http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/62481366/John-Wiley-amp-Sons-v-Kirtsaeng#fullscreen:on">John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc v. Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, No. 09-4896.</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Mine o&#8217; Mine, Inc. v. Calmese</strong></p>
<p>Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz"> http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz</a><br />
Decision:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt"> http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt</a></p>
<h4 style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">Quick Takes</h4>
<p><strong>Jury Sides With DreamWorks Animation in &#8216;Kung Fu Panda&#8217; Case</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019</a></p>
<p><strong>Project Runway Hit With Copyright Lawsuit from Photographer</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618</a></p>
<p><strong>The Wild Lawsuit Against Bravo&#8217;s &#8216;Million Dollar Decorators&#8217;</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179</a></p>
<p><strong>Copyright for All Primates?</strong><br />
Nearby Café:<a href="http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129"> http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129</a><br />
Art Info:<a href="http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/"> http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/</a></p>
<p><strong>Real World Sued For Failing to Blur Shadow Dancers</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947</a></p>
<p><strong>A Village Person Test The Copyright Law</strong><br />
NYTimes:<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1"> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1</a></p>
<p><strong>Marlon Brando Estate Sues Over &#8216;Brando&#8217; Sofas</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596</a></p>
<p>NEW US CODE SEARCH TOOL  <a href="http://uscodebeta.house.gov/">http://uscodebeta.house.gov/</a></p>
<p>THE FAIR USE CALCULATOR AT <a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">HTTP</a><a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">://librarycopyright.net/fairuse </a></p>
<h4 dir="ltr">not legal advice, but a useful tool to document your arguments on the 4 factors&#8230;.</h4>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode023.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>This latest episode of Entertainment Law Update Podcast is now available.  Please visit our Web site to listen, or subscribe and download using iTunes, Android or your preferred podcatcher.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)


Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	* Righthaven is wrong... again, and again, and again....
	* Disney Appeals  &quot;Millionaire&quot; verdict
	* Wizard of Oz film characters still protected
	* First Sale doesn&#039;t apply to imported goods
	* Monkeying around with copyright
	* and more...

GET CLE CREDIT (http://cle-podcasts.com/store)f or this episode.

 
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg)Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com (http://www.goclio.com) and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio (http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio)
Show Notes
Follow Ups

Righthaven suffers three strikes in one week
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok (http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok)The cases in question:
Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC, 2011 WL 2378186 (D. Nev. June 14, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.);Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, 2011 WL 2441020 (D. Nev. June 20, 2011) (Philip M. Pro, J.);Righthaven LLC v. DiBiase, Case No. 2:10-cv-01343-RLH-PAL, Order (D. Nev. June 22, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.).

Link to Strategic Alliance Agreement. (http://media.lasvegassun.com/media/pdfs/blogs/documents/2011/04/15/rhavenstrategicalliance.pdf)

Disney Appeals $319 Million &#039;Millionaire&#039; Verdict
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538)

Jack Kirby appeals loss in Marvel copyright lawsuit
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642)
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151)



=====================

Feature Stories
Warner Bros. Wins Key Legal Ruling Impacting All &#039;Wizard of Oz&#039; Remakes
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255)
Link to decision: http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR (http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR)

If you’re interested in reading the entire decision, the case is called Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v.  X One X Productions.

Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company (http://supreme.justia.com/us/188/239/case.html), 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the
U.S. Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by copyright.  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright)
Copyright owners win broader rights for works made abroad Thompson Reuters: http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/ (http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/)
John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc v. Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, No. 09-4896. (http://www.scribd.com/doc/62481366/John-Wiley-amp-Sons-v-Kirtsaeng#fullscreen:on)
Mine o&#039; Mine, Inc. v. Calmese
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz (http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz)
Decision: http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt (http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt)
Quick Takes
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 22 &#8211; Violent Games, (anti) Slapps and other painless fun</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/07/761/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/07/761/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Hangover Tattoo case settled Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot California Video Game Law unconstitutional You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either. Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hangover Tattoo case settled</li>
<li>Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot</li>
<li>California Video Game Law unconstitutional</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either.</li>
<li>Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-761"></span>Show Notes<!-- ol{margin:0;padding:0}p{margin:0}.c9{width:468pt;background-color:#ffffff;padding:72pt 72pt 72pt 72pt}.c6{color:#000099;font-size:14pt;font-weight:bold}.c2{font-size:14pt;font-family:Georgia}.c7{color:#333333;font-family:Trebuchet MS}.c1{color:inherit;text-decoration:inherit}.c3{color:#454545;font-family:Georgia}.c16{background-color:#ea9999}.c8{text-align:center}.c18{color:#454545}.c10{color:#000099}.c12{font-weight:bold}.c11{font-style:italic}.c17{font-size:12pt}.c14{background-color:#ffffff}.c0{direction:ltr}.c15{font-size:14pt}.c13{font-family:Georgia}.c4{text-decoration:underline}.c19{font-size:10pt}.c5{height:11pt}body{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial}h1{padding-top:24pt;color:#000000;font-size:24pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}h2{padding-top:18pt;color:#000000;font-size:18pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h3{padding-top:14pt;color:#000000;font-size:14pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h4{padding-top:12pt;color:#000000;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h5{padding-top:11pt;color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h6{padding-top:10pt;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt} --></h2>
<h2 class="c0"><span class="c6 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">Warner Bros. Settles &#8216;Hangover II&#8217; Tattoo Lawsuit </a></span></h2>
<p class="c0"><span class="c4">Whitmill v. Warner Bros.</span><span>THREsq: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>.</span></p>
<h2 class="c0"><span class="c6 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">Second Circuit Finds &#8220;Hot News&#8221; Misappropriation Claim Preempted By Copyright Act</a></span></h2>
<p class="c0 c5"><span class="c13 c19"> </span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>In </span><span class="c11">Barclay&#8217;s Capital Inc. v. TheFlyontheWall.com</span><span>, </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">Link to decision</a></span><span class="c10 c13 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">.</a></span></p>
<p class="c0 c5"><span class="c13"> </span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>Copyright Litigation Blog: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html</a></span></p>
<p class="c0 c5"><span class="c3"> </span></p>
<h2 class="c0"><span class="c4 c6"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">Rebecca Black&#8217;s &#8216;Friday&#8217; Taken Off YouTube</a></span></h2>
<p class="c0"><span class="c4"> Rebecca Black adv. Ark Music</span></p>
<p class="c0"><span> THREsq: </span><span class="c4 c10"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>TMZ: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/">http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/</a></span></p>
<p class="c0 c5"><span> </span></p>
<h2 class="c0"><span class="c6 c4"> <a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">Supreme Court Strikes Down California Video Game Law </a></span></h2>
<p class="c0"><span class="c4"> Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association,</span></p>
<p class="c0"><span> THREsq: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>Lexology:</span></p>
<p class="c0"><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>California video game law: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html">http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>Supreme Court decision: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf">http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf</a></span></p>
<h2 class="c0"><span class="c6 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">Is the idea to use a hair dryer as a weapon copyrightable? No, says Second Circuit.</a></span></h2>
<p class="c0"><span class="c14">Cabell v. Sony Pictures </span><span class="c10 c14 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures">http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures</a></span><span class="c10 c4 c16"><a class="c1" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures"> </a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span> THREsq: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span class="c10 c4"><br />
</span></p>
<h1 class="c0"><span class="c6 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">Shock Jocks&#8217; Photo Credit Edit Breached DMCA: 3rd Circ</a></span></h1>
<p class="c0"><span class="c11">Murphy v. Millenium Radio Group</span><span>, LLC.</span></p>
<p class="c0"><span> Link to decision: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf">http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>Law360: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>Lexology: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span class="c10 c4"><br />
</span></p>
<h1 class="c0"><span class="c6 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">Songwriter Wins Round in Legal Battle with Summit Over &#8216;Twilight&#8217; Song</a></span></h1>
<p class="c0"><span>THREsq: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span class="c10 c4"><br />
</span></p>
<h1 class="c0"><span class="c6 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">Bridal shop loses trademark rights for naked licensing</a></span></h1>
<p class="c0"><span class="c11">Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enter., Inc</span><span>., Case No. 10-2863 (7th Cir., May 10, 2011).</span></p>
<p class="c0"><span>Link to decision: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span> See also: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span class="c17">See also, </span><span class="c10 c11 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3467365781852035897">FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network</a></span><span>, __ F.3d. __, 2010 WL 4749044, No. 08-16382 (9th Cir. Nov. 24, 2010).  Abandonment of trademark by naked license.</span></p>
<p class="c0"><span> RCFP: </span><span class="c10 c4"><a class="c1" href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931</a></span></p>
<p class="c0"><span class="c10 c4"> <a class="c1" href="http://www.legal-project.org/149/anti-slapp-statutes-in-the-us-by-state">List of Anti Slapp Statutes by State </a></span></p>
<p class="c0 c5"><span> </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/07/761/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode022.mp3" length="69614874" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Hangover Tattoo case settled   Hot News Claim - not so hot   California Video Game Law unconstitutional   You don&#039;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either. </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png)
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)


Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	* Hangover Tattoo case settled
	* Hot News Claim - not so hot
	* California Video Game Law unconstitutional
	* You don&#039;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either.
	* Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach
	* and more...

GET CLE CREDIT (http://cle-podcasts.com/store)  (http://cle-podcasts.com/store)for this episode.

 
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg)Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com (http://www.goclio.com) and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio (http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio)
Show Notes
Warner Bros. Settles &#039;Hangover II&#039; Tattoo Lawsuit  (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377)
Whitmill v. Warner Bros.THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377)
.

Second Circuit Finds &quot;Hot News&quot; Misappropriation Claim Preempted By Copyright Act (http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html)
 
In Barclay&#039;s Capital Inc. v. TheFlyontheWall.com, Link to decision (http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both). (http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both)
 
Copyright Litigation Blog: http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html (http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html)
 

Rebecca Black&#039;s &#039;Friday&#039; Taken Off YouTube (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893)
 Rebecca Black adv. Ark Music
 THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893)
TMZ: http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/ (http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/)
 

 Supreme Court Strikes Down California Video Game Law  (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827)
 Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association,
 THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827)
Lexology:
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term= (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=)
California video game law: http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html (http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html)
Supreme Court decision: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf (http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf)

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 21 &#8211; Tough Cookies and Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/06/episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/06/episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dish Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harley Davidson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Christensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makes and Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorcycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entertainment Lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett discuss recent cases, rulings, regulations and news stories of interest to the entertainment legal community.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers</li>
<li>Tennessee Neftlix Law</li>
<li>Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants</li>
<li>Disney and Dish Network duke it out</li>
<li>One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies</li>
<li>Point Break Parody lawsuit</li>
<li>&#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; as a brand?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-747"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Follow Ups</h3>
<h4><a href="http://zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-problems-of-not-clearing-copyright-issues-before-filming-starts/">Copyrights and Wrongs on Tyson tattoo zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-p&#8230;</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=">In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name &amp; Likeness Litigation www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_&#8230;</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Link to Opinion: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t">http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/">District Court Judge Puts Righthaven Cases on Hold     feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739">Copyright Preemption: A Royal Pain For Idea Submission Plaintiffs in New York<br />
www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Also reported at :  <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hayden-christensens-lawsuit-usa-tossed-187290">Hayden Christensen&#8217;s Lawsuit Against USA Tossed Out by Judge &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.law360.com/articles/245836">HUMPHREY BOGART Furniture Settlement</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-harley-189775">BRANDO SUES HARLEY-DAVIDSON</a></h4>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO">Link to the Brando boots on Amazon.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO"> </a> (Looks like Harley Davidson has changed the name of the boot to “Smith”&#8230; but when you type “Brando boot” into Amazon&#8230; it still shows up, along with three other boots using that name&#8230;.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-749 aligncenter" title="Amazon.com_ brando boot_ Shoes-1" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Amazon.com_-brando-boot_-Shoes-1-300x175.png" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Legislation and Regulatory</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.musicrow.com/2011/06/tennessee-signs-law-prohibiting-netflix-password-sharing/">Tennessee Netflix Law: Password Sharing a Crime &#8211; Legislation &amp; Policymaking &#8211; FindLaw Blotter</a></h4>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">Copyright Office Rules on Termination &#8220;Gap Grants.&#8221; </a></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf">http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">www.copyright.gov</a></p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Rulings  &amp; Opinions</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695">Judge Denies Disney&#8217;s Motion to Stop Dish From Distributing Movies for Free &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-team-6-trademark.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_elegal">Disney Surrenders to Navy on &#8216;SEAL Team 6&#8242; Trademark &#8211; Celebrity Intellectual Property &#8211; Celebrity Justice blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-te&#8230;</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application/">http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704">NY Bakery Owner Sues Scripps Network Over Food Network Show &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704 </a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657">Who Has the Right to Parody Keanu Reeves&#8217; Work In &#8216;Point Break&#8217;? &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The case is Keeling v. New Rock Theatre Productions  Opinion is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/05/18/Point%20Break%20Live!.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/movie-rights-30-year-old-188604">Movie Rights To 30-Year-Old Book at Center of Lawsuit .</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-just-ask-john-elway.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TrademarkLawyerAttorneyLawFirmRegistrationInfringement+%28Trademark+Law+Practice+Alerts%29">Personal Names can be Protected as Trademarks: Just Ask John Elway tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-&#8230;</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Read more: <a href="http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J">http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6debc5d9-098d-4a9a-a918-24ab056b3803&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-19&amp;utm_term=">Trademark rights to “heart attack” designation on food menus contested</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Read more: <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD">http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/20/nothing-like-a-brando-harley-davidson-sued-over-name-of-new-line-of-boots/">Nothing Like a Brando: Harley-Davidson Sued Over Name of New Line of Boots</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-laced-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Laced Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-cast-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Cast Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-gains-big-after-ubs-report-2011-06-06?siteid=rss&amp;rss=1">Harley-Davidson gains big after UBS report</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-motorcycle-boots/">Shoe Cravings: Motorcycle Boots</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.onlineshoes.com/blog/outdoor/going-wild-how-to-find-the-right-motorcycle-boots">Going Wild: The Motorcycle Diaries</a> (onlineshoes.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-men%25e2%2580%2599s-boots-for-spring/">Shoe Cravings: Men&#8217;s Boots for Spring</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://hellforleathermagazine.com/2011/04/how-to-sell-a-harley-davidson/">How to sell a Harley-Davidson</a> (hellforleathermagazine.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/30/the-harley-davidson-scooter/">The Harley-Davidson Scooter</a> (neatorama.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-receives-short-term-buy-from-ubs-2011-06-06?siteid=rss">Harley Davidson receives short-term buy from UBS</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://stillisstillmoving.com/willienelson/american-icons-willie-nelson-harley-davidson-and-country-music-throwdown/">American Icons: Willie Nelson, Harley Davidson, and Country Music Throwdown</a> (stillisstillmoving.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/17/the-mouse-takes-bin-laden-disney-moves-to-claim-trademark-to-seal-team-six/">The Mouse Takes Bin Laden: Disney Moves To Claim Trademark to &#8220;Seal Team Six&#8221;</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://shortformblog.tumblr.com/post/5873500207/disney-trademark-seal-team-6">Disney abandons plan to trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (shortformblog.tumblr.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/05/26/seal-team-6-disney/">Disney backs away from &#8216;SEAL Team 6′ trademark</a> (insidemovies.ew.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://thedailywh.at/2011/05/25/follow-up-of-the-day-11/">Follow Up of the Day: Disney Withdraws SEAL Team 6 Trademark Applications</a> (thedailywh.at)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://videogum.com/309931/update-disney-withdraws-application-to-trademark-seal-team-6/behind-the-scenes/">UPDATE: Disney Withdraws Application To Trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6″</a> (videogum.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-20062914-10391698.html">Disney trademarks &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (cbsnews.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304066504576345752703592770.html">Disney Retreats&#8230;</a> (online.wsj.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2011/05/disney-drops-its-trademark-application.html">&#8220;Disney Drops Its Trademark Application For SEAL Team Six&#8221; and related posts</a> (warnewsupdates.blogspot.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=c9436f93-0b96-4c6a-a361-be925a63ea5f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/06/episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode021.mp3" length="70605199" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>Automotive,Business,Dish Network,Harley Davidson,Hayden Christensen,Makes and Models,Motorcycle,United States</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Entertainment Lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett discuss recent cases, rulings, regulations and news stories of interest to the entertainment legal community.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png)
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)


Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	* Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers
	* Tennessee Neftlix Law
	* Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants
	* Disney and Dish Network duke it out
	* One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies
	* Point Break Parody lawsuit
	* &quot;Heart Attack&quot; as a brand?
	* and more...

GET CLE CREDIT (http://cle-podcasts.com/store)  (http://cle-podcasts.com/store)for this episode.

 
(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg)Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com (http://www.goclio.com) and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio (http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio)
Show Notes
Follow Ups
Copyrights and Wrongs on Tyson tattoo zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-p... (http://zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-problems-of-not-clearing-copyright-issues-before-filming-starts/)
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name &amp; Likeness Litigation www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_... (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=)
Link to Opinion: http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t (http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t)

District Court Judge Puts Righthaven Cases on Hold     feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/ (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/)
Copyright Preemption: A Royal Pain For Idea Submission Plaintiffs in New York
www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739 (http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739)
Also reported at :  Hayden Christensen&#039;s Lawsuit Against USA Tossed Out by Judge - Hollywood Reporter (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hayden-christensens-lawsuit-usa-tossed-187290)

HUMPHREY BOGART Furniture Settlement (http://www.law360.com/articles/245836)
BRANDO SUES HARLEY-DAVIDSON (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-harley-189775)
Link to the Brando boots on Amazon. (http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO)

  (http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO) (Looks like Harley Davidson has changed the name of the boot to “Smith”... but when you type “Brando boot” into Amazon... it still shows up, along with three other boots using that name....

(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Amazon.com_-brando-boot_-Shoes-1-300x175.png)

 
Legislation and Regulatory
Tennessee Netflix Law: Password Sharing a Crime - Legislation &amp; Policymaking - FindLaw Blotter (http://www.musicrow.com/2011/06/tennessee-signs-law-prohibiting-netflix-password-sharing/)
Copyright Office Rules on Termination &quot;Gap Grants.&quot;  (http://www.copyright.gov/)
http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf (http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf)
www.copyright.gov (http://www.copyright.gov/)

Rulings  &amp; Opinions
Judge Denies Disney&#039;s Motion to Stop Dish From Distributing Movies for Free - Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

