<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com</link>
	<description>News, Analysis, Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 23:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>Entertainment Lawyer Gordon Firemark&#039;s monthly roundup of entertainment law cases, news and commentary.  Continuing Legal Education credit available for California attorneys.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" />
	<copyright>Copyright 2011 - 2013 by Gordon P Firemark</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Monthly</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>entertainment, law, show business, media, copyright, film, television, music, trademark</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Business" />
		<rawvoice:rating>TV-G</rawvoice:rating>
		<rawvoice:frequency>monthly</rawvoice:frequency>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 40 &#8211; Areo, ReDigi, Veoh &amp; IMDB</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/05/episode-40-areo-redigi-veoh-imdb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/05/episode-40-areo-redigi-veoh-imdb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 23:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  YouTube wins again  Photographer can sell reprints  IMDB Prevails over actress in age disclosure case  Veoh service is legal and more…       Hosts:  Website:   http://firemark.com  http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremark   Website:   http://createprotect.com  Twitter: @tamerabennett     Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/05/episode-40-areo-redigi-veoh-imdb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode040.mp3" length="61356905" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>firemark, tamera, lawyer, entertainment, film, television, theatre, copyright, fair use, veoh, youtube</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   YouTube wins again  Photographer can sell reprints  IMDB Prevails over actress in age disclosure case  Veoh service is legal and more…        Hosts:   Website:   http://firemark.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

 YouTube wins again
 Photographer can sell reprints
 IMDB Prevails over actress in age disclosure case
 Veoh service is legal
and more…

 
 
 
Hosts:

 Website:   http://firemark.com  http://theatrelawyer.com,
Twitter: @gfiremark  

Website:   http://createprotect.com 
Twitter: @tamerabennett
 
 
Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
YouTube Again Beats Viacom&#039;s Massive Copyright Infringement Lawsuit:
(Last discussed in ELU039, March 29, 2013)
LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-youtube-prevails-copyright-suit-viacom-20130418,0,5832848.story 
THResq:
www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/youtube-again-beats-viacoms-massive-442233
 
Viacom Intl., et. al. v. YouTube, Inc., et. al. - S.D.N.Y. Decision for YouTube - Apr. 18, 2013
 
Judge Rules William Eggleston Can Clone His Own Work, Rebuffing Angry Collector:
(Last discussed in ELU030, April 29, 2012)
Blouin Art Info: http://www.blouinartinfo.com/news/story/885054/judge-rules-william-eggleston-can-clone-his-own-work-rebuffing
Center for Art Law: http://www.itsartlaw.com/2013/04/in-sobel-v-eggleston-limited-edition-is.html
 
Sobel v. Eggleston - S.D.N.Y. decision for Eggleston - March 28, 2013
 
 
Appropriation art alive and well after Second Circuit ruling in Cariou v. Prince:
(Last discussed in ELU019, April 8, 2011)
IP Intelligence Report: http://www.ipintelligencereport.com/2013/04/25/appropriation-art-alive-and-well-after-second-circuit-ruling-in-cariou-v-prince/
Decision: http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/5da8dc66-179e-4dc0-94cc-09e213bfffe3/1/doc/11-1197_complete_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/5da8dc66-179e-4dc0-94cc-09e213bfffe3/1/hilite/
 
Cariou v. Prince - 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the denial of an injunction against Aereo - April 1, 2013
 
 
 
Patrick Cariou’s photograph from Yes Rasta on left, Prince’s version on the right.
 
Personal Audio LLC Podcast Patent Suit filed Against CBS Corp. and NBC Universal Media:
(Last discussed in ELU038, February 19, 2013)
Mandour &amp; Associates: http://www.californiapatentattorney.pro/2013/04/cbs-and-nbc-sued-in-podcasting-patent-infringement-cases.html
PRWeb: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10655478.htm
CBS Complaint: http://www.scribd.com/doc/135451057/Personal-Audio-v-CBS
 
Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS Corp.; Personal Audio, LLC v. NBC Universal - E.D.T.X. - Filed April 11, 2013
 
The Georgia Supreme Court recognizes a claim for misappropriation of likeness:
Lexology: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ce014723-1152-474a-806f-a6248ff431d8
 
Bullard v. MRA Holding, LLC - Supreme Court of Georgia decision for Bullard - March 28, 2013
 
Joe Francis Files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in February so Joe Francis can avoid 2 Million debt to vegas mogul Steve Wynn http://blogs.wsj.com/bankruptcy/2013/02/28/girls-gone-wild-files-for-bankruptcy/
 
Julie Taymor and &#039;Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark&#039; Producers Finally Reach Settlement:
(Last discussed in ELU038, February 19, 2013)
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/julie-taymor-spider-man-turn-436846
 
Taymor v. Eight Legged Productions - Settlement - April 10, 2013
 
 
Universal Music Asks Court To Rehear Veoh Case Yet Again:
(Last discussed in ELU039, March 29, 2013)
Techdirt: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/16085022605/veoh-still-not-dead-enough-universal-music-asks-court-to-rehear-case-yet-again.shtml
Petition for Rehearing: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/681152-veohpetition4rehearing.html
 
UMG Recordings, et. al. v.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:03:34</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 39 &#8211; Holmes, Zorro and the Tin Man walk into a bar&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/03/episode-39-holmes-zorro-and-the-tin-man-walk-into-a-bar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/03/episode-39-holmes-zorro-and-the-tin-man-walk-into-a-bar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Ed Sullivan intro of Jersey Boys is fair use Kirtsaeng – First Sale has extraterritorial effect Sherlock Holmes copyright questions and more… Hosts:  Website:   http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremark         Website:   http://createprotect.com Twitter: @tamerabennett  Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/03/episode-39-holmes-zorro-and-the-tin-man-walk-into-a-bar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode039.mp3" length="73596904" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Ed Sullivan intro of Jersey Boys is fair use Kirtsaeng – First Sale has extraterritorial effect Sherlock Holmes copyright questions and more…   Hosts:  Website:   http://firemark.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

Ed Sullivan intro of Jersey Boys is fair use
Kirtsaeng – First Sale has extraterritorial effect
Sherlock Holmes copyright questions
and more…


Hosts:
 Website:   http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremark
 
 
 
 

Website:   http://createprotect.com Twitter: @tamerabennett
 Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio

Ed Sullivan intro of Jersey Boys is fair use
Kirtsaeng – First Sale has extraterritorial effect
Sherlock Holmes copyright questions
and more…
Show Notes 
 
 
Appeals Court: &#039;Ed Sullivan&#039; Clip in &#039;Jersey Boys&#039; is Fair Use:
(Last discussed in ELU 013, August 2010)
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-ed-sullivan-clip-427260
Justia (Decision): http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/10-56535/10-56535-2013-03-11.pdf
 
 




Sofa Entertainment, Inc. v. Dodger Prod. - 9th Circuit decision for Dodger Prod. - March 11, 2013




 
 
 
 
Appellate Court Clears Veoh in UMG Copyright Suit:
(Last discussed in ELU032, July 2012)
Variety: http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/appellate-court-clears-veoh-in-umg-copyright-suit-1200194954/
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-hands-veoh-win-428588
 
 




UMG Recordings v. Veoh - 9th Circuit decision for Veoh - March 14, 2012 - superseding opinion




 
 
 
Supreme Court upholds first-sale doctrine in textbook resale case:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/03/thai-student-protected-by-first-sale-supreme-court-rules/
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-rules-entertainment-industry-429695
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-697_d1o2.pdf
 
 




Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons - U.S. Supreme Court decision for Kirtsaeng - March 19, 2013




 
 
 
Judge Bans Airing of Lifetime TV&#039;s Chris Porco Movie, Injunction Stayed by Appeals Court:
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/lifetimes-chris-porco-movie-banned-429988
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/lifetime-wins-right-air-chris-430286
 
 




Christopher Porco v. Lifetime - Appeal to NY Supreme Ct., Appellate Division - March 20, 2013




 
 
 
Current paparazzi cases/issues:
AP: http://www.statesman.com/ap/ap/california/hawaii-senate-to-vote-on-steven-tyler-act/nWhN9/
Justia: http://verdict.justia.com/2013/03/19/is-hawaiis-steven-tyler-act-consistent-with-the-first-amendment
Text of the Bill:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/bills/SB465_.htm
 
       
California Judge Shoots Down Challenge to Talent Agencies Act:
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/california-judge-dismisses-talent-managers-426263
(They plan to appeal - see press release pasted in this doc) - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dcYiiAS4f7oEcv6guxJl4uPYxR49C_MNBzvNtsC9yQk/edit?usp=sharing
 
 




National Conference of Personal Managers, Inc. v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr - Nov. 9, 2012 - Central District of California




 
 
 
Is Sherlock Holmes Still in Copyright?:
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/book-editor-doyle-estate-is-421918
Mark Litwak: http://marklitwak.blogspot.com/2013/03/sherlock-holmes-and-case-of-public.html
Create Protect: http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/sherlock-holmes-elementary-copyright-protection-and-trademarks/
 
 
 




Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate - Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in N.D. Illinois - February 14, 2013




 
 
 
 
“Zorro” Rights Challenged as Invalid and Fraudulent:
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/zorro-rights-challenged-as-invalid-428561
 
 




Cabell v.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:16:19</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 38 &#8211; When a foot is only 11 inches, and a Batmobile is a character</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/02/episode-38-when-a-foot-is-only-11-inches-and-a-batmobile-is-a-character/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/02/episode-38-when-a-foot-is-only-11-inches-and-a-batmobile-is-a-character/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Subway&#8217;s footlong subs aren&#8217;t Bikram yoga isn&#8217;t too hot on court ruling Soundalikes strike dissonant chord for the Black Keys Podcast Patent lawsuit Batmobile is a character, not just a prop,  and more&#8230; Hosts:  Website:   http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremark         Website:   http://createprotect.com Twitter: @tamerabennett  Entertainment Law Update [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/02/episode-38-when-a-foot-is-only-11-inches-and-a-batmobile-is-a-character/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/entertainmentlawupdateepisode38.mp3" length="65114776" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Subway&#039;s footlong subs aren&#039;t Bikram yoga isn&#039;t too hot on court ruling Soundalikes strike dissonant chord for the Black Keys Podcast Patent lawsuit Batmobile is a character, not just a prop,  </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

Subway&#039;s footlong subs aren&#039;t
Bikram yoga isn&#039;t too hot on court ruling
Soundalikes strike dissonant chord for the Black Keys
Podcast Patent lawsuit
Batmobile is a character, not just a prop, ...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:07:29</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t panic!  No January 2013 episode</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/02/dont-panic-no-january-2013-episode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/02/dont-panic-no-january-2013-episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to scheduling conflicts, we were not able to record an episode in January.Stay Tuned for our next episode in late February.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2013/02/dont-panic-no-january-2013-episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2247963/ELU_Jan_13.mp3" length="759086" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Due to scheduling conflicts, we were not able to record an episode in January.Stay Tuned for our next episode in late February.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Due to scheduling conflicts, we were not able to record an episode in January.Stay Tuned for our next episode in late February.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 37 &#8211; Top ten for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/12/episode-37-top-ten-for-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/12/episode-37-top-ten-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Our 2012 Wrap up and totally unscientific Top Ten Cases. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/12/episode-37-top-ten-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/entertainmentlawupdateepisode037.mp3" length="56715738" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231In this Episode:Our 2012 Wrap up and totally unscientific Top Ten Cases.Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231In this Episode:Our 2012 Wrap up and totally unscientific Top Ten Cases.Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clioHosts: Website:   http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremarkWebsite:   http://createprotect.com Twitter: @tamerabennettEntertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio   FOLLOW-UPS AND QUICK TAKES &#039;Indiana Jones&#039; Lawsuit Seeks Hollywood Profits from Alleged Crystal Skull Theft: THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/indiana-jones-lawsuit-seeks-hollywood-399236The Complaint: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B7c_uKsEeLrwUUtINFFsTnI0ZlU In 1924, Crystal Skull was found in Belize by Anna Mitchell-Hedges and her father.  Mitchell-Hedges recently passed away and left the skull to a man named William Homann.Before she passed away, Mitchell-Hedges appeared on a SciFi channel documentary about the skullswhich aired in 2008, disclosing that she was in possession of the skull.The complaint alleges that various laws passed in Belize prior to the skull being taken out of the country made it illegal to do so, and that the archaeological expedition itself was undertaken outside of the required approval of the government.Dr. Jaime Awe, Director of the Institute of Archaeology in Belize, is suing Homann and the Mitchell-Hedges estate for replevin, accounting for profits, and tortious interference with Prospective Economic Advantage.Awe is ALSO suing Lucasfilm, Paramount Pictures, and the Walt Disney Company, alleging that they have profited off of the use of the Mitchell-Hedges skull (referred to in the film Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull as the “Mitchell-Hedges skull,” but said to be from Peru)Awe is seeking injunctive relief, accounting for profits, and is accusing the film defendants of Tortious Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage and Civil Conspiracy The actual Mitchell-Hedges skull: The Indiana Jones version:  Shahs of Sunset - “Persian Barbie” Trademark DisputeTHResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hollywood-docket-john-travolta-wins-legal-fees-sex-life-author-399316TMZ.com: http://www.tmz.com/2012/12/02/shahs-of-sunset-bravo-niki-ghazian-lily-ghalichi-cease-desist-letter/  Model Niki Ghazian has sent a cease and desist letter to Bravo TV Network and the producers of the show “Shahs of Sunset” over their use of the term “Persian Barbie” to describe one of the cast members of that show.Ms. Ghazian claims that she has been using that term to describe herself since 2005 and is the “common law” owner of the mark (she has never applied for a trademark).She is demanding that Bravo stop using the term in their advertising for the show, on their website, or on any press releases.Niki Ghazian (left), Lilly Ghalichi (right) “Age of the Hobbits” Gets New Title, Still On Sale Despite Injunction:THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/age-hobbits-is-clash-empires-401897THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/age-hobbits-gets-new-title-401217THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/age-hobbits-sale-court-order-403685 Warner Bros. and producer Saul Zaentz have filed suit against production company The Asylum over the “mockbuster” film Age of the Hobbits,</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gordon Firemark on This Week In Law (TWIL), Episode 190</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/12/gordon-firemark-on-this-week-in-law-twil-episode-190/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/12/gordon-firemark-on-this-week-in-law-twil-episode-190/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appearances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWIL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gordon has been asked to again appear on the  This Week in Law podcast with hosts Denise Howell and Evan Brown.  The other guest  on his week&#8217;s show is UCLA law professor Kal Raustiala,  who blogs at The Knock Off Economy  The show will be recorded live on Friday, December 7th at 11:00am Pacific time.   You can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/12/gordon-firemark-on-this-week-in-law-twil-episode-190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 36 &#8211; Faulkner, Einstein, Superman and talent managers…</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/11/episode-36-faulkner-einstein-superman-and-talent-managers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/11/episode-36-faulkner-einstein-superman-and-talent-managers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[        Hosts:   Gordon FiremarkWebsite:   http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremark         Tamera Bennett Website:   http://createprotect.com Twitter: @tamerabennett   Show Notes Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: William Faulkner’s suit against Sony Pictures and Woody Allen;   Warner Brothers has won an important victory in the Superman litigation, Albert Einstein’s likeness is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/11/episode-36-faulkner-einstein-superman-and-talent-managers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpsiode036.mp3" length="67172743" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>attorney,copyright,entertainment,law,lawyer,media,podcast,privacy,publicity</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>        Hosts:   Gordon FiremarkWebsite:   http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremark         Tamera Bennett Website:   http://createprotect.com Twitter: @tamerabennett    Show Notes  Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary> 
 
 
 
Hosts:
 
Gordon FiremarkWebsite:   http://firemark.com http://theatrelawyer.com, Twitter: @gfiremark
 
 
 
 
Tamera Bennett
Website:   http://createprotect.com Twitter: @tamerabennett

 
Show Notes

Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

William Faulkner’s suit against Sony Pictures and Woody Allen;  
Warner Brothers has won an important victory in the Superman litigation, 
Albert Einstein’s likeness is now in the public domain, and 
a group representing talent managers is suing California officials over the state’s licensing statute for agents
and much more...

 
Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio 
Same-Sex Couple Sues Anti-Gay Rights Organization for Misappropriation of Their PhotographEntertainment Law Matters: http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2262
(Follow up from ELU33)
Link to Complaint:  http://www.fkks.com/blog/Hill%20Complaint.pdf

Judge denies Fox&#039;s request to stop Dish&#039;s commercial-skipping service
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-injunction-dish-autohop-387458
(Follow up from ELU31)

UMG Reaches Settlement in Trendsetting Suit Over Digital Revenue from Eminem Songs
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/umg-reaches-settlement-trendsetting-lawsuit-384381
(Follow up from ELU32, among others)

Sony Sued Over William Faulkner Quote in &#039;Midnight in Paris&#039;
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/sony-sued-william-faulkner-quote-383228
CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/06/showbiz/movies/faulkner-midnight-paris-allen-lawsuit/index.html

Soldier&#039;s Widow Sues Fox Over TV Images of Military Families
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/soldiers-widow-sues-fox-tv-385923
Complaint: http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/kltv/PDF/roberts_suit_11092012.pdf

News Flash: Beating Client with A Baseball Bat is Unethical
Lawyerist: http://lawyerist.com/beating-client-with-a-baseball-bat-is-unethical/

Appeals Court Rules &#039;Twin Peaks&#039; Author Didn&#039;t Give Up Film Rights to Book
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-rules-twin-peaks-387785Warner Bros. Wins Big Court Ruling in Fight Over SupermanTHResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-big-court-379770Ruling: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/custom/Documents/ESQ/Superman.pdfBytes and Pieces: http://www.medialawbytesandpieces.com/2012/10/29/pocket-full-of-kryptonite-california-court-rules-that-superman-heirs-forfeited-termination-rights/?goback=%2Egde_84443_member_181273644&#039;The Bachelor&#039; Racial Discrimination Lawsuit DismissedTHResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bachelor-racial-discrimination-lawsuit-dismissed-379100Federal Court Rejects Albert Einstein Right of Publicity ClaimEntertainment Law Matters: http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2278Netflix Gets an Earful and Settles Suit with Deaf ViewersLawyers.com: http://blogs.lawyers.com/2012/10/netflix-gets-an-earful-and-settles-suit-with-deaf-viewers/Ruling on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: http://dredf.org/captioning/MJP-DENIED-JUDGE-PONSOR-ORDER-6-19-12.pdf&#039;Dog&#039; Chapman Scores Big Legal Victory Against &#039;Bounty Hunter&#039; Producer THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/dog-chapman-scores-big-legal-387379National Conference of Personal Managers Sues California Officials to Enjoin Enforcement of the Talent Agencies ActTHResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/personal-managers-group-sues-stop-389786Complaint: http://www.scribd.com/doc/113104861/Ncopm-Complaint-v-Aglc-of-CAFor our next episode, we’ll be talking about some of the biggest cases of the year,</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:09:37</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 35 &#8211; Hot Dogs and Hot Topics</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/09/episode-34-publicity-politicians-new-sec-rules-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/09/episode-34-publicity-politicians-new-sec-rules-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  James Taylor sues WB Records  Gamblers prevail Using Brando&#8217;s likeness isn&#8217;t in &#8220;Vogue&#8221; for Madonna Copyright Term Extension &#8211; Again? Innocence of Muslims suit by actress &#8220;Franks Anatra&#8221; trademark denied. Please nominate us for a podcast award (in the &#8216;Business&#8217; category) Entertainment Law Update is brought to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/09/episode-34-publicity-politicians-new-sec-rules-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/entertainmentlawupdateepisode035.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>Brando,copyright,Entertainment law,publicity</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   James Taylor sues WB Records    Gamblers prevail   Using Brando&#039;s likeness isn&#039;t in &quot;Vogue&quot; for Madonna   Copyright Term Extension - Again?   Innocence of Muslims suit by actress </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	 James Taylor sues WB Records
	 Gamblers prevail
	Using Brando&#039;s likeness isn&#039;t in &quot;Vogue&quot; for Madonna
	Copyright Term Extension - Again?
	Innocence of Muslims
suit by actress
	&quot;Fran...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:08:37</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 34 &#8211; Publiciity, Politicians, Godfathers and more&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-34-publiciity-politicians-godfathers-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-34-publiciity-politicians-godfathers-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marilyn monroe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Burberry/Bogart case settled Marilyn Monroe Estate loses Right of Publicity Political Campaigns use of music at rallies Desparate Housewife Sheridan still desperate  SEC Rulemaking to relax ban on general solicitations North Face Butt Face/South Butt contempt claim Paramount/Puzo Case over Godfather prequel novel Resale Royalties Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-34-publiciity-politicians-godfathers-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/entertainmentlawupdateepisode034.mp3" length="66206132" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>copyright,entertainment lawyer,marilyn monroe,podcast,privacy,publicity,trademarks</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Burberry/Bogart case settled Marilyn Monroe Estate loses Right of Publicity Political Campaigns use of music at rallies Desparate Housewife Sheridan still desperate  </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

Burberry/Bogart case settled
Marilyn Monroe Estate loses Right of Publicity
Political Campaigns use of music at rallies
Desparate Housewife Sheridan still desperate 
SEC Rulemaking to relax ban on general solicitations
North Face Butt Face/South Butt contempt claim
Paramount/Puzo Case over Godfather prequel novel
Resale Royalties Act unconstitutional
.. and more.

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.
Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
 

Show Notes
 
 

FOLLOW-UPS AND QUICK TAKES
Burberry Drops Lawsuit Against Humphrey Bogart HeirsBusiness Week: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-08-01/burberry-drops-lawsuit-against-humphrey-bogart-heirsDigiLaw Blog: http://digilaw.edwardswildman.com/?entry=4143Discussed previously in ELU031

In May, Burberry sought a declaratory judgment against the heirs of Humphrey Bogart, claiming that their use of Bogart’s image in advertisements was not an infringement on Bogart LLC’s trademark and publicity rights.
Bogart LLC then sued Burberry for trademark infringement, misappropriation of publicity rights, and unjust enrichment in California court, seeking money damages and an injunction.
Burberry had licensed the image in question from Corbis for use on its Facebook page, but did not obtain permission from Bogard LLC.
On July 31st, both suits were settled on undisclosed terms, and dismissed with prejudice.

Maybe You Can Take it With You: Post-mortem Publicity Rights in the United States/Marilyn MonroeWorld Trademark Review (pdf): http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/issues/article.ashx?g=d8dc2b5e-e441-457f-8329-8ff1bc02503c#page=1THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-rules-marilyn-monroes-image-public-estate-367160Discussed previously in ELU029 (Marylin Monroe) and ELU030 (Tupac Hologram)

On August 30th, the 9th Circuit ruled that, at the time of her death, Marilyn Monroe was domiciled in New York.
The court ruled that, since at the time of her death her estate claimed that she was domiciled in New York to escape hefty estate taxes in California, the estate could not claim that she was domiciled in California in order to take advantage of a more generous right of publicity statute.
In affirming the lower court decision, Judge Wardlaw says that “This is a textbook case for applying judicial estoppel.”

General Post-Mortem Right of Publicity Info from other article

Two issues central to every Post-Mortem Right of Publicity claim


Whether a state recognises a right of publicity that continues after an individual’s death
Which state’s law applies to a particular deceased individual


Monroe example
New York does not recognize a post-mortem right of publicity, and California does, therefore the fight over which state’s law applies
Domicile is a fact-specific analysis, taking into account such factors as


length of residence;
place of worship;
voting registration;
automobile registration;
club memberships;
locations of children’s schools;
location of bank accounts;
location of business dealings; and
where tax returns are filed

Newt Gingrich Settling Lawsuit Over Use of &#039;Eye of the Tiger,’ plus new Political Song Use Troubles THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/newt-gingrich-settling-lawsuit-eye-of-tiger-365019Discussed previously in ELU028Lexology: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=09dd0f1a-2125-45bc-a075-d453c0c0ada2Gingrich Follow Up

In January, Survivor member Frankie Sullivan sued Gingrich for using Eye of the Tiger as his walkout music at rallies and conferences
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 33  &#8211; Cease and Desist, but nicely.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/08/episode-33-cease-and-desist-but-nicely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/08/episode-33-cease-and-desist-but-nicely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode: J. Geils Band Trademark Dispute Two Three&#8217;s Companys is a crowd Copyright Royalty Board unconsitutional Jack Daniels sends the sweetest cease and desist ever and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/08/episode-33-cease-and-desist-but-nicely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpsiode033.mp3" length="67321311" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>appeals,copyright,courts,entertainment,law,procedure,supreme,trademark</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  J. Geils Band Trademark Dispute   Two Three&#039;s Companys is a crowd   Copyright Royalty Board unconsitutional   Jack Daniels sends the sweetest cease and desist ever   and more... - </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	J. Geils Band Trademark Dispute
	Two Three&#039;s Companys is a crowd
	Copyright Royalty Board unconsitutional
	Jack Daniels sends the sweetest cease and desist ever
	and more...

GET CLE...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:09:47</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 32 &#8211; Lawyers, Libel , Logos and Lolipops</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/07/episode-32-lawyers-libel-logos-and-lolipops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/07/episode-32-lawyers-libel-logos-and-lolipops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Court to revisit Veoh ruling Football Uniforms trademark not infringed by artist&#8217;s work Funny Junk/The Oatmeal, and their lawyer&#8217;s exploits. Lawyers sued for participating in litigation? What? What? In the Butt? Maker&#8217;s Mark&#8230;. is! and more&#8230; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/07/episode-32-lawyers-libel-logos-and-lolipops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode032.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Court to revisit Veoh ruling   Football Uniforms trademark not infringed by artist&#039;s work   Funny Junk/The Oatmeal, and their lawyer&#039;s exploits. </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	Court to revisit Veoh ruling
	Football Uniforms trademark not infringed by artist&#039;s work
	Funny Junk/The Oatmeal, and their lawyer&#039;s exploits.
	Lawyers sued for participating in litig...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 031 &#8211; Terminations, Taxes and Takedowns</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/05/episode-031-terminations-taxes-and-takedowns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/05/episode-031-terminations-taxes-and-takedowns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 06:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; &#160; Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 &#160; &#160; &#160; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/05/episode-031-terminations-taxes-and-takedowns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode031.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>  -   -   Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231   -   -   GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. - Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary> 

 

 
Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
 

 

 
GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
VILLAGE PEOPLE SINGER VICTOR WILLIS WINS COPYRIGHT TERMINATION LAWSUIT

THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/village-people-victor-willis-copyright-lawsuit-323489

 

SUPREME COURT REFUSES TO HEAR JOEL TENENBAUM APPEAL

Billboard: http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/joel-tenenbaum-files-for-rehearing-of-675k-1005482952.story

 

PARAMOUNT GETS MIXED RULINGS

THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/paramount-la-dolce-vita-licensing-lawsuit-315553

 

REP. BERMAN SEEKS TAX CREDIT EXTENSIONS FOR U.S. FILM PRODUCTION

THRESq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/howard-berman-hollywood-tax-credits-326652?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thr%2Fnews+%28The+Hollywood+Reporter+-+Top+Stories%29

 

DOCUMENTARY FILMS LOSSES ARE DEDUCTIBLE, NOT A HOBBY LOSS

Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/co4ykpw

Decision: http://www.ballardspahr.com/~/media/Files/Alerts/2012-04-20_Storey.ashx

 

ROMANCE AUTHOR ADELE DUBOIS RECEIVES TAKEDOWN NOTICE

TechDirt: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120517/17443418961/romance-author-adele-dubois-receives-takedown-blog-post-having-same-name-as-singer-adele.shtml?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter

 

BURBERRY SCORES A BOGIE IN FEDERAL SUIT

Unruly of Law Blog: http://theunrulyoflaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/burberry-scores-bogie-in-federal-suit.html

 

DISH vs. TV NETWORKS

WSJ: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304070304577396470142982532.html

THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/directv-autohop-lawsuit-fox-331112

 
SONY SUED FOR NOT COLLECTING ROYALTIES FROM ALABAMA SONG
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/sony-sued-alabama-royalties-323930

CBS SUES ABC OVER ‘BIG BROTHER’ TYPE SHOW ‘GLASS HOUSE’
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/cbs-lawyers-threaten-abc-big-320431

HOW THE WEINSTEINS BEAT ‘SOUL MAN’ SINGER SAM MOORE
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/weinstein-sam-moore-lawsuit-330072

NEW ‘GODFATHER’ BOOK WILL BE PUBLISHED
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/godfather-book-paramount-mario-puzo-323597</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 30 &#8211; JOBS Act, crowdfunding, limited editions, and more.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/04/episode-30-jobs-act-crowdfunding-limited-editions-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/04/episode-30-jobs-act-crowdfunding-limited-editions-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube Magic Tricks &#8211; how to keep &#8216;em secret Art Collector v. Artist? and more&#8230; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/04/episode-30-jobs-act-crowdfunding-limited-editions-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode030.mp3" length="71623301" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law   Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube   Magic Tricks - how to keep &#039;em secret   Art Collector v. Artist?   and more... </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law
	Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube
	Magic Tricks - how to keep &#039;em secret
	Art Collector v. Artist?
	and more...




Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio

Hosts:

Gordon Firemark
Websites:   http://firemark.com , http://theatrelawyer.com,
Twitter: @gfiremark

 

 

 

 


Tamera Bennett
Website:   http://createprotect.com
Twitter: @tamerabennett

 

 

 
 Guests


Peter Kaufman joins us again for  this episode.

Website: http://dealfatigue.com
Twitter: @dealfatigue.

 

 

 

Also with us, in the studio:  Chris Blake, one of our interns, just completing his 2L year at Pepperdine Law.
Show Notes

CROWD-FUNDING AND THE JOBS ACT
JOBS ACT/CROWD-FINANCING
Lexology: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ad3e7f78-fc57-4909-8d5e-dd9ac6cc6ef7

Key points of the bill:

	Allows equity-based crowdfunding
	Removes prohibitions on general solicitation of Regulation D offerings
	Creates an IPO &quot;on ramp&quot; -
	Increases threshold for Regulation A &quot;mini public offerings&quot;
	Raises cap on private shareholders from 500 to 2,000

EFFECT ON FILM FINANCING
Filmmaker Magazine: http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/how-the-jobs-act-will-transform-independent-film-financing/

 
THEATRE: THE GODSPELL EXAMPLE
NY Times: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/theater/for-godspell-on-broadway-crowd-sourced-producers.xml?single=1
VIACOM/YOUTUBE FOLLOW-UP
Lexology: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=76982154-a450-4e75-a3d8-7b928cbb3865&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-04-23&amp;utm_term=

 

Link to Slip Opinion http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/doc/10-3270_10-3342_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c5792ca8-db37-4107-b0f7-67548a6a5a5f/1/hilite/
Last Samurai - Copyright Script Jury Verdict
THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/last-samurai-zwick-herskovitz-win-lawsuit-309268
Teller sues over magic trick reveal
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/penn-teller-lawsuit-reveal-secrets-youtube-312296
Art Collector seeks to stop photographer from selling Digital Reprints
Entertainment Law Matters: http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=2119
Tupac Hologram performs ‘live’ at Coachella Music Festival
Billboard: http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/tupac-coachella-hologram-very-unique-legally-1006792552.story
Amazon Studios revises terms for writers
Filmmaker Magazine: http://www.filmmakermagazine.com/news/2012/04/amazon-studios-revises-terms-for-writers/
Music royalty settlement announced on mechanical royalties
Lexology: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4df04006-c8f1-428c-be5b-9f8f47935e9a&amp;goback=%2Egde_2824501_member_109202270

Until next time.... that&#039;s showbiz!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:14:16</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 29 &#8211; 360 deals, rights of publicity, and more</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: &#160; 360 Deals and the Talent Agencies Act More music sale vs. license litigation Copyright Termination update ReDigi injunction denied Aereo and retransmission fees and more. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/03/episode-29-360-deals-rights-of-publicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode029.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>  Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: -    360 Deals and the Talent Agencies Act   More music sale vs. license litigation   Copyright Termination update   ReDigi injunction denied   Aereo and retransmission fees   and more.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary> 
Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

 

	360 Deals and the Talent Agencies Act
	More music sale vs. license litigation
	Copyright Termination update
	ReDigi injunction denied
	Aereo and retransmission fees
	and more.




Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
Hosts:
 
Gordon P. Firemark
Website:   http://firemark http://theatrelawyer.com,
Twitter: @gfiremark
Tamera Bennett

Website:   http://createprotect.com
Twitter: @tamerabennett


  
Our Guest:
Erin Jacobson practices  in Los Angeles, California where she represents musicians, songwriters, producers, companies, and other entertainment professionals.  She has held several different positions in the music industry, including a stint as a DJ at USC’s campus radio station,  and in addition to  her transactional work music and entertainment, she also handles handles copyright and trademark issues for her clients in and around the industry.  She scored a great domain name...  Her Web site is at http://themusicindustrylawyer.com
360 DEALS in conflict with the Talent Agencies Act
TheMusicIndustryLawyer.com:   “360 Deals and the California Talent Agencies Act:  Are Record Labels Procuring Employment? ” by: Erin M. Jacobson

Sister Sledge and Kenny Rogers sue over license revenue share:
THR-esq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/sister-sledge-files-class-action-286903
THR-esq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/kenny-rogers-lawsuit-capitol-records-291388
Temptations Join Chorus of Lawsuits Over iTunes Royalties

THREsq (3/15/2012): http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/temptations-itunes-lawsuits-300733
Running list of sale vs license lawsuits:
http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/recording-artists-suing-for-digital-royalty-accountings/
Roger Miller Copyright Termination

Lexology (3/5/2012): http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0184062b-dd76-434c-a96c-0b2c9024ea7e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2012-03-09&amp;utm_term=

Decision: http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/12a0049p-06.pdf

YMCA Termination

THREsq (3/22/2012): http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ymca-village-people-lawsuit-copyright-termination-303377
Drake sued by ex-GF:

NY Daily News: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music-arts/drake-sued-alleged-ex-girlfriend-marvin-room-royalties-article-1.1016669?localLinksEnabled=false

THR-Esq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/drake-girlfriend-marvins-room-lawsuit-286916
FOLLOW-UPS
Variety Settles Long-Running Lawsuit Against L.A. Punk Band
THREsq (2/13/2012): http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-lawsuit-vandals-punk-band-289700
http://www.vandals.com/Vandals/Variety_Vs._Vandals_Blog/Entries/2011/4/10_Federal_Justice_Sleet_Agrees_with_The_Vandals._Variety_Loses_First_Round%21.html
Judge Denies Efforts to Shut Down ReDigi
Hollywood Reporter (2/6/2012): http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/redigi-digital-music-lawsuit-287410

Aereo sued over Broadcast Television Retransmission:
Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-201203201727reedbusivarietynvr1118051689mar20,0,3231770.story
Paul Weiss: http://www.paulweiss.com/files/Publication/996550c4-13ad-4a93-a375-5212822783ca/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/98133588-7295-4138-9d83-5492743e477f/CTD3-9-12.pdf#page=3
Marlon Brando Estate Wins Judgment Against Ashley Furniture:
MarketWatch (2/6/2012): http://www.marketwatch.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 28 &#8211; Political Campaigns, combat helicopters and Batmobiles.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode, we discuss political campaign uses of music, tv news clips, etc., We talk with a prominent Canadian entertainment lawyer about differences in copyright law, moral rights, fair use, and more.  Plus, a  look at several recent cases in the entertainment and media law fields.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode028.mp3" length="65235910" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we discuss political campaign uses of music, tv news clips, etc., We talk with a prominent Canadian entertainment lawyer about differences in copyright law, moral rights, fair use, and more.  Plus,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this episode, we discuss political campaign uses of music, tv news clips, etc., We talk with a prominent Canadian entertainment lawyer about differences in copyright law, moral rights, fair use, and more.  Plus, a  look at several recent cases in the entertainment and media law fields.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:13:04</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 27 &#8211; Top 10 Stories of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round up of 2011's top entertainment, copyright, trademark and media law stories.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2012/01/episode-27-top-10-stories-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode027.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Round up of 2011&#039;s top entertainment, copyright, trademark and media law stories.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Round up of 2011&#039;s top entertainment, copyright, trademark and media law stories.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:12:11</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 26 &#8211; Attack of the Little Trees!</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/12/episode-26-attack-of-the-little-trees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/12/episode-26-attack-of-the-little-trees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest Peter Kaufman joins hosts Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett for this roundup of legal news and opinion covering the fields of Film, Television, Music, Theatre, Copyright, Trademark and Internet law.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/12/episode-26-attack-of-the-little-trees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode026.mp3" length="59990436" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, media, copyright, trademark, music, film, television, crowdfunding, law</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Guest Peter Kaufman joins hosts Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett for this roundup of legal news and opinion covering the fields of Film, Television, Music, Theatre, Copyright, Trademark and Internet law.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Guest Peter Kaufman joins hosts Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett for this roundup of legal news and opinion covering the fields of Film, Television, Music, Theatre, Copyright, Trademark and Internet law.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:12:11</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 025 &#8211; What&#8217;s with all the Zombies?</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monthly roundup of entertainment law news and case briefs from Entertainment Lawyers Gordon P. Firemark and Tamera Bennett]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpsiode025mp3.mp3" length="59643571" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Monthly roundup of entertainment law news and case briefs from Entertainment Lawyers Gordon P. Firemark and Tamera Bennett</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Monthly roundup of entertainment law news and case briefs from Entertainment Lawyers Gordon P. Firemark and Tamera Bennett</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 024 &#8211; Wronghaven, Immaterial Girls &amp; Noodle Bowls</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/09/episode-024-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/09/episode-024-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode:

Righthaven is wrong... even more
$10 infringement settlements
Tenenbaum award reinstated
Indies sue Limewire
Betty Boop ruling revised
Material Girl trademark suit proceeds
You can't copyright food]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/09/episode-024-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode024.mp3" length="64003963" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>copyright,Intellectual Property,law</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode: - Righthaven is wrong... even more $10 infringement settlements Tenenbaum award reinstated Indies sue Limewire Betty Boop ruling revised Material Girl trademark suit proceeds You can&#039;t copyright food</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this Episode:

Righthaven is wrong... even more
$10 infringement settlements
Tenenbaum award reinstated
Indies sue Limewire
Betty Boop ruling revised
Material Girl trademark suit proceeds
You can&#039;t copyright food</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELU Episode 023 &#8211; Monkeying Around with Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This latest episode of Entertainment Law Update Podcast is now available.  Please visit our Web site to listen, or subscribe and download using iTunes, Android or your preferred podcatcher.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode023.mp3" length="5242880" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>This latest episode of Entertainment Law Update Podcast is now available.  Please visit our Web site to listen, or subscribe and download using iTunes, Android or your preferred podcatcher.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This latest episode of Entertainment Law Update Podcast is now available.  Please visit our Web site to listen, or subscribe and download using iTunes, Android or your preferred podcatcher.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 22 &#8211; Violent Games, (anti) Slapps and other painless fun</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/07/761/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/07/761/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Hangover Tattoo case settled Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot California Video Game Law unconstitutional You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either. Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/07/761/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode022.mp3" length="69614874" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Hangover Tattoo case settled   Hot News Claim - not so hot   California Video Game Law unconstitutional   You don&#039;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either. </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	Hangover Tattoo case settled
	Hot News Claim - not so hot
	California Video Game Law unconstitutional
	You don&#039;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either.
	Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach
	and more...

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

 
Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
Warner Bros. Settles &#039;Hangover II&#039; Tattoo Lawsuit 
Whitmill v. Warner Bros.THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377
.

Second Circuit Finds &quot;Hot News&quot; Misappropriation Claim Preempted By Copyright Act
 
In Barclay&#039;s Capital Inc. v. TheFlyontheWall.com, Link to decision.
 
Copyright Litigation Blog: http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html
 

Rebecca Black&#039;s &#039;Friday&#039; Taken Off YouTube
 Rebecca Black adv. Ark Music
 THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893
TMZ: http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/
 

 Supreme Court Strikes Down California Video Game Law 
 Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association,
 THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827
Lexology:
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=
California video game law: http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html
Supreme Court decision: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf

Is the idea to use a hair dryer as a weapon copyrightable? No, says Second Circuit.
Cabell v. Sony Pictures http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures 
 THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956



Shock Jocks&#039; Photo Credit Edit Breached DMCA: 3rd Circ
Murphy v. Millenium Radio Group, LLC.
 Link to decision: http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf
Law360: http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip
Lexology: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18



Songwriter Wins Round in Legal Battle with Summit Over &#039;Twilight&#039; Song
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813



Bridal shop loses trademark rights for naked licensing
Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enter., Inc., Case No. 10-2863 (7th Cir., May 10, 2011).
Link to decision: http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf
 See also: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=
See also, FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network, __ F.3d. __, 2010 WL 4749044, No. 08-16382 (9th Cir. Nov. 24, 2010).  Abandonment of trademark by naked license.
 RCFP: http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931
 List of Anti Slapp Statutes by State 
 
 </itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 21 &#8211; Tough Cookies and Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/06/episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/06/episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dish Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harley Davidson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Christensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makes and Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorcycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entertainment Lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett discuss recent cases, rulings, regulations and news stories of interest to the entertainment legal community.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/06/episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode021.mp3" length="70605199" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>Automotive,Business,Dish Network,Harley Davidson,Hayden Christensen,Makes and Models,Motorcycle,United States</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Entertainment Lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett discuss recent cases, rulings, regulations and news stories of interest to the entertainment legal community.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Entertainment Lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett discuss recent cases, rulings, regulations and news stories of interest to the entertainment legal community.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 20 &#8211; Tattoos and Topiaries</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-tattoos-and-topiaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-tattoos-and-topiaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 05:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bratz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mattel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGA Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc. Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims Vandals smear Variety No moral rights in landscape design? Tattoo Law and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-tattoos-and-topiaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode020.mp3" length="97634010" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>entertainment, show business, copyright, trademark, music, film, publicity, law, lawyers, litigation</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.   Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million   Copyright doesn&#039;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims   Vandals smear Variety </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.
	Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million
	Copyright doesn&#039;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims
	Vandals smear Variety
	No moral rights in landscape design?
	Tattoo Law
	and more...

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.
 

Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
Follow Ups
Girls Gone Wild founder cleared in civil case 
 Righthaven

Copyright Troll Clobbered: Judge Finds Use of Entire News Article Fair Use

 

Righthaven and the Case or Controversy Clause

 

But Your Honor, We Bought The Right To Sue! 
Bratz
Mattel, MGA Fight Final Brawl Over Bratz Rights
How the Bratz Verdict May Impact You
Bryant/MGA v. Mattel (Bratz dolls)

Bloomberg: http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl

LA Times: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story



In a retrial over who owns the rights to the billion-dollar Bratz doll franchise, a federal jury found that
Mattel misappropriated trade secrets from MGA and owes the company $88.5 million. An 8-person jury
unanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that Mattel did not own the rights to the
Bratz dolls, early models or sketches; and said that MGA did not steal trade secrets.ew trial.

 
9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law
Larry Montz, et al v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, In, et al
 

Alien vs Predator  infringement plaintiff loses on access AND similarity
Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn

Opinion: http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg



 

Variety takes on The Vandals in Delaware and loses ground... case will move to California

Variety Loses Round One to Punk Band In Album Cover Dispute ...

 

THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026

Punk Band Wins Legal Skirmish, Lambastes Plaintiff and Opposing Counsel in
Animated Video
 
Moral Rights in your backyard?
Landscaper artist’s &quot;rights of integrity&quot; not violated by city trimming his garden

  TheSeventh Circuit recently rejected a landscape artist’s claim that his rights of integrity were violated when the city of Chicago altered his artistic garden in Chicago’s Grant Park. The Court held that a garden cannot be copyrighted and thus, an artist cannot successfully claim that his “moral rights” are violated if the garden is altered or destroyed.

 

Fake Script infringed by blog?

Lionsgate claims that reviewing false script is copyright infringement

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml


A&amp;E loses appeal of idea theft claim
Appeals
Court Upholds $4M Verdict Against A&amp;E Over &#039;Flip This House” 

 

Comic Book Cases 

 Stan Lee Media v. Stan Lee

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918



In the latest news regarding the long-running legal battle between comic book writer/creator Stan Lee and the company that bears his name, Stan Lee Media Inc., a California federal judge will decide whether a trial is necessary to determine who holds the rights to Marvel characters such as Spiderman, the Incredible Hulk, X-Men, Iron Man, the Fantastic Four, and Thor.

 Warner Bros./DC Comics and Superman litigation

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832



In the latest move in Warner Bros.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 019 &#8211; Boop Boop Be Doo!</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/04/episode-019-boop-boop-be-doo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/04/episode-019-boop-boop-be-doo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups Penguin Group Golan v. Holder Documentary/Reality and privacy rights Cariou v. Prince Betty Boop and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/04/episode-019-boop-boop-be-doo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode019.mp3" length="92682137" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   Follow Ups   Penguin Group   Golan v. Holder   Documentary/Reality and privacy rights   Cariou v. Prince   Betty Boop   and more... - GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.   - </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	Follow Ups
	Penguin Group
	Golan v. Holder
	Documentary/Reality and privacy rights
	Cariou v. Prince
	Betty Boop
	and more...

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.
 

Entertainm...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:09:02</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Edition: Jonathan Handel:  Hollywood On Strike</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/03/special-edition-jonathan-handel-hollywood-on-strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/03/special-edition-jonathan-handel-hollywood-on-strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: 310-243-6231 In this SPECIAL Episode: Jonathan Handel talks about the 2007-2009 Hollywood labor strife and his new book on the subject. BUY THE BOOK Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age (print) Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age (kindle)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/03/special-edition-jonathan-handel-hollywood-on-strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode018a.mp3" length="27057708" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback:  310-243-6231 In this SPECIAL Episode: Jonathan Handel talks about the 2007-2009 Hollywood labor strife and his new book on the subject. - BUY THE BOOK - Hollywood on Strike!</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback: 
310-243-6231
In this SPECIAL Episode:
Jonathan Handel talks about the 2007-2009 Hollywood labor strife and his new book on the subject.

BUY THE BOOK

Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age (print)

Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age (kindle)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 18 of beauty queens and footlong sandwiches</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/03/episode-18-of-beauty-queens-and-footlong-sandwiches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/03/episode-18-of-beauty-queens-and-footlong-sandwiches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups Gaga / Madonna Tolkien estate vs. Book Author Subway Footlong trademark claims King&#8217;s Speech/No Animals Harmed Superbowl Class Action Medical Justice and DMCA for review sites Miss San Antonio de-throned, files suit and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/03/episode-18-of-beauty-queens-and-footlong-sandwiches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode018.mp3" length="72098798" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   Follow Ups   Gaga / Madonna   Tolkien estate vs. Book Author   Subway Footlong trademark claims   King&#039;s Speech/No Animals Harmed   Superbowl Class Action </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	Follow Ups
	Gaga / Madonna
	Tolkien estate vs. Book Author
	Subway Footlong trademark claims
	King&#039;s Speech/No Animals Harmed
	Superbowl Class Action
	Medical Justice and DMCA fo...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:12:26</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 17:  Can Kanye write songs 140 characters at a time?</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/01/episode-17-can-kanye-write-songs-140-characters-at-a-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/01/episode-17-can-kanye-write-songs-140-characters-at-a-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups UMG v. Augusto Brill v. Disney New CRB Royalty Rates Josh Groban sings Kanye’s tweets Right of Publicity cases and the Constitution Record Labels to pay $47.5 Million Defamation in Copyright Registration Presley Estate Sues Chrysalis GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2011/01/episode-17-can-kanye-write-songs-140-characters-at-a-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode017.mp3" length="62263455" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   Follow Ups   UMG v. Augusto   Brill v. Disney   New CRB Royalty Rates   Josh Groban sings Kanye’s tweets   Right of Publicity cases and the Constitution   Record Labels to pay $47.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	Follow Ups
	UMG v. Augusto
	Brill v. Disney
	New CRB Royalty Rates
	Josh Groban sings Kanye’s tweets
	Right of Publicity cases and the Constitution
	Record Labels to pay $47.5 Mi...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update, Episode 16:</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/12/episode-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/12/episode-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: follow ups Recent Cases and Decisions Some online resources we use to keep on top of the stories. Our top stories for 2010 GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/12/episode-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode016.mp3" length="85710460" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   follow ups   Recent Cases and Decisions   Some online resources we use to keep on top of the stories.   Our top stories for 2010 - GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	follow ups
	Recent Cases and Decisions
	Some online resources we use to keep on top of the stories.
	Our top stories for 2010

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.


Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio

SHOW NOTES


FOLLOW UPS

Jim Morrison pardoned for 1969 Indecent Exposure conviction

Conviction stemmed from a concert given at the Dinner Key Auditorium in Miami, and  Morrison died before his appeal could be heard.

Doors drummer John Densmore told  The Hollywood Reporter that Morrison was charged with the wrong thing.

&quot;He was drunk and disorderly, but he didn&#039;t whip it out,&quot; Densmore explained.

Dora the Explorer Suit settled

Supreme Court Denies Cert in Harper (innocent infringer) file sharing case
Maverick Recordings v. Harper
The Fifth Circuit ruled that Harper cannot claim the &quot;innocent infringer&quot; defense because the record label plaintiffs had affixed proper notices on physical CDs embodying the works at issue. See 17 U.S.C. § 402(d) (&quot;If a notice of copyright in the form and position specified by this section appears on the published phonorecord or phonorecords to which a defendant in a copyright infringement suit had access, then no weight shall be given to such a defendant’s interposition of a defense based on innocent infringement in mitigation of actual or statutory damages, except as provided in the last sentence of section 504.&quot;). The Supreme Court&#039;s refusal to hear the case leaves the Fifth Circuit&#039;s decision in place.
Copyrights &amp; Campaigns: Thomas-Rasset: I owe nothing; labels seek injunction; court to Nesson: you&#039;re no amicus of mineso
Most recent verdict resulted in a $1.5 Million (24 songs at $62,500 each) award to the plaintiffs, again based on statutory damages... Defendant is forgoing a remittitur motion, and instead moves for modification of the award to $0, on Due Process Grounds.

The argument is that the Plaintiffs didn’t prove their actual damages, so any ‘punitive’ award must bear some relation to the actual injury CAUSED BY the Defendant.  (READ CONCLUSION FROM MOTION)

Meanwhile, the defendants are seeking an injunction against further infringement, and the court REJECTED an amicus brief from Professor Charles Nesson, who represented Joel Tannenbaum in his file-sharing suit, which had similar issues.

CASES &amp; OTHER ENTERTAINMENT LAW NEWS

Lawsuit Seeks to expose truth behind  “Catfish”

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/lawsuit-seeks-expose-truth-catfish-55969
Catfish is ostensibly a documentary about a guy who falls in love with a woman he met online, but never in person.  Supposedly, she’s musician, and sends him beautiful pictures of herself and some of her recorded songs. (except they’re not hers...he eventually figures this out by comparing her songs to  some songs from YouTube.   Then he goes to her house to confront her, and learns that she’s not young, she’s not pretty and she’s not single.

So, the question is whether the whole film is a fabrication.

Why does it matter... well, the record company Spin Move Records owns the  recording of one of the songs the woman claimed as her own (Amy Kuney’s “All Downhill from here”)  ... and their  parent company, Threshold Media, is suing.

The filmmakers, and the distributor claim it’s fair-use.  The label says it’s not.  Not if the film or the relevant scenes were staged or set-up.

But does it matter?  If it really is a documentary, is it a fair use?

(Shades of Joaquin Phoenix / Letterman situation we discussed in episode 14)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 15 &#8211; tiny astronauts and child actresses</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/11/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-15-tiny-astronauts-and-child-actresses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/11/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-15-tiny-astronauts-and-child-actresses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: follow ups Ageism in Hollywood is getting out of hand Hitchcock Movies never go out of style Oprah gets sued for publicizing author&#8217;s work Photographer claims r TV movie photo infringes his image You did what I asked of you&#8230; How could you do that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/11/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-15-tiny-astronauts-and-child-actresses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode015.mp3" length="48875560" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   follow ups   Ageism in Hollywood is getting out of hand   Hitchcock Movies never go out of style   Oprah gets sued for publicizing author&#039;s work </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	follow ups
	Ageism in Hollywood is getting out of hand
	Hitchcock Movies never go out of style
	Oprah gets sued for publicizing author&#039;s work
	Photographer claims r TV movie photo infringes his image
	You did what I asked of you... How could you do that to me?
	Do tiny astronauts have a right of publicity?
	Bob Marley Family loses

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.




SHOW NOTES
QUICK TAKES &amp; FOLLOW UPS

Lime Wire Shut Down
The United States District Court, Southern District, has issued a permanent injunction against operation of the P2P downloading site Lime Wire, ending a drawn-out legal battle. Citing evidence that the site is used &quot;overwhelmingly for infringement&quot; and that Lime Wire &quot;encouraged infringement&quot; among other things, Judge Kimba Wood issued the injunction on October 26th on behalf of numerous record companies including Arista Records, Capitol Records, and Sony Music Entertainment.

As revenge, &#039;Anonymous&#039; cyber  group hacks RIAA  website - site was down for 14 hours.





We  mentioned the terrific Intellectual Property Colloquium podcast, hosted by UCLA Law Professor Doug Lichtman where episode 14 is a clever approach to voicing the arguments in Viacom v. YouTube.

The Guys over at Technically Legal reported on the dismissal of  Righthaven’s case against Michael Nelson on fair use grounds.  (Righthaven is the outfit that’s suing bloggers over news items being republished.)  Trouble is, the decision to dismiss was made by the JUDGE, on the pleadings...., even though Fair Use requires a fact-based analysis.  Is this grounds for appeal?  Isn’t Fair Use a question for the jury?


Technnically Legal post

Court Order dismissing case

Techdirt:  The Rise of Mass Copyright Infringement Filing Shakedown Factories in the US

Cake Boss title dispute settled.
http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2010/10/cakebosssettlement.html

We Ask the Listeners:  Should the plaintiffs in a “Girls Gone Wild” lawsuit against Joe Francis be allowed to proceed anonymously? 

Call us with your opinions and thoughts. Our listener feedback number is (310) 243-6231

Free speech battle over &#039;Girls Gone Wild&#039; lawsuit

The girls were all under 18 at the time they were taped exposing themselves to  camera.  Now in their 20s, they want to spare themselves unnecessary humiliation.

The free speech battle flared when a federal judge in Florida rejected the request to allow the women to file the lawsuit without using their name, prompting an appeal. That led Florida Freedom Newspapers Inc. and the Southern Newspaper Publishers Association to wade into the First Amendment fight.

These media outlets want access to the information, and claim &quot;It ought to be up to the press to manage this information - and not up to the courts,&quot;
&quot;The editorial process is based on access to openness,&quot; said  Jeffery Nobles, attorney for the newspapers association. &quot;And the purpose of fact-checking is obscured and prevented when parties come to court anonymously.&quot;


STORIES


Is age-ism in Hollywood getting out of hand?.  Dora the Explorer voice actress dismissed after hitting puberty.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/39572576

 
Caitlin Sanchez was 12 when she was hired as the voice of Nickelodeon&#039;s hitanimated series &quot;Dora the Explorer.&quot; She was paid $5,115 per episode and allegedly promised a cut of Dora&#039;s lucrative merchandising revenue. Now, three years later, after being dismissed from her role because she reached puberty and could no longer provide the correct-sounding voice, Sanchez has some observers questioning the network&#039;s practices in hiring minors.

The teen&#039;s lawsuit  says that she signed an &quot;unconscionable&quot; contract without the advice of an attorney. Instead, Sanchez, her parents and her agent (who is now said to have been inexperienced) were given 22 minutes to sign the deal or lose the &quot;Dora&quot; gig.


</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 14 &#8211; Mockumentaries, Downloads, Licenses, and First Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/09/643/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/09/643/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode: follow ups Letterman v. Phoenix? Naked Cowpersons Eminem wins on downloads ASCAP Loses on downloads MADONNA not the only material girl Ivi, Inc. says it doesn&#8217;t need a license for tv rebroadcasts Righthaven: Troll or Defender? Vernor v. Autodesk &#8211; is the first sale doctrine dead? GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/09/643/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode014.mp3" length="61913757" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode:   follow ups   Letterman v. Phoenix?   Naked Cowpersons   Eminem wins on downloads   ASCAP Loses on downloads   MADONNA not the only material girl   Ivi, Inc. says it doesn&#039;t need a license for tv rebroadcasts </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this Episode:


	follow ups
	Letterman v. Phoenix?
	Naked Cowpersons
	Eminem wins on downloads
	ASCAP Loses on downloads
	MADONNA not the only material girl
	Ivi, Inc. says it doesn&#039;t need a license for tv rebroadcasts
	Righthaven: Troll or Defender?
	Vernor v. Autodesk - is the first sale doctrine dead?



GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

SHOW NOTES
 Follow ups


	Paris Hilton settles “That’s Hot” litigation 

greeting card featured a scene with a  caption that read &quot;Paris&#039;s First Day as a Waitress&quot; and made a pun on her trademarked catch phrase, &quot;That&#039;s Hot.&quot; In 2007, Hilton sued, claiming her publicity rights had been violated.

	Lindsay Lohan Settles “Milkaholic” suit - poll says she’s “too sensitive”http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2010/09/lindsay-lohan-etrade-settle-milkaholic-baby-lawsuit-poll.html

	Fox News settles Bernie Madoff footage dispute
(use of footage ran beyond the license term... settled by stipulation, terms not disclosed)
	Viacom appeals Google/Youtube ruling not much to say here... we wait and see.


	Judge more than doubles award to Don Johnson in &#039;Nash Bridges&#039; lawsuit | L.A. NOW | Los Angeles TimesLast Month, the jury awarded Johnson $23.2 million in profits from the show. The actor contended that he owned half of the show’s copyright but had not been paid his share of the profits.In Wednesday’s ruling, Judge Michael Stern ordered Rysher Entertainment to pay pre-judgment interest to the actor on top of the verdict, bringing the total sum to more than $51 million.


	Celador wins interest award of $50 Million in “Millionaire” case  (on a $270 Million damages award)

Stories
Letterman threatens suit against Joaquin Phoenix over use of late show footage in film

Would David Letterman sue Joaquin Phoenix? (video)

YouTube - Joaquin Phoenix Bizarre Interview on Letterman: The New Andy Kaufman? - www.twitter.com/mjdasilva

SpringBoardMedia: Fair Use, Mockumentary and Letterman

Naked Cowboy vs Naked Cowgirl

Naked Cowgirl trying to invalidate Naked Cowboy trademark

 

Burck&#039;s Trademark registration number 3792432

Trademark Trials and Appeals Blog  http://ttablog.com

 

Eminem Wins lawsuit  against label over characterization of downloads

Issue was whether Aftermath’s provision of Eminem’s songs to iTunes was a “sale” or “license” for purposes of a contract drafted in the pre-digital age.

Media Law Prof Blog: Ninth Circuit: Downloads &quot;Licensed&quot; Under Eminem&#039;s Contract; Entitled To Fifty Percent Royalties

Lexology - The Ninth Circuit&#039;s Eminem license vs sale decision

F.B.T. Productions vs. Aftermath Records US 9th Circuit Opinion

 

2nd Circuit ruled (just yesterday (9/28)) against ASCAP (ASCAP v. YAHOO, et.al.)

upholding a lower court ruling  that DOWNLOADS are NOT public Performances

http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i513cc43382b2c2e36cb6ff07e07a902a

Supreme Court to review file-sharing case

Harper v. Maverick Recording Co.

Supreme Court could take its first RIAA file-sharing case

Supreme Court requests response on &#039;innocent infringer&#039; cert. petition

 

Madonna sued

LA Triumph, a clothing manufacturer based in — where else? — Los Angeles, says Madonna’s Material Girl line of clothing for Macy’s breaches its trademark for the name. The company claims it’s owned a brand of clothing called Material Girl since 1997.

Madonna Lawsuit - Material Girl Sued | Styleite

New Live TV Streaming startup Ivi, Inc. relying on interesting copyright provisions to avoid liability

ivi, Inc., has raised $1 million in venture funding with a self-proclaimed &quot;legal strategy&quot; to rebroadcast television online without the permission of broadcasters or content-owners.

The company claims it doesn&#039;t need to actually have permission from broadcasters or content owners. Instead, according to an interviewgiven by ivi founder and CEO Todd Weaver to TechFlash,</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 13 &#8211; copyrights, trademarks, fair use and net profit suits</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/08/episode_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/08/episode_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update - Episode 13
In this Episode:
Follow Ups:  Justin Bieber; Tenenbaum, Kate Plus 8
Fleeting Expletives
JayZ wins
A few Fair Use cases
Copyrights, Trademark cases
Some BIG wins for plaintiffs in profit participation suits.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/08/episode_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode013.mp3" length="3758664" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Entertainment Law Update - Episode 13 In this Episode: Follow Ups:  Justin Bieber; Tenenbaum, Kate Plus 8 Fleeting Expletives JayZ wins A few Fair Use cases Copyrights, Trademark cases Some BIG wins for plaintiffs in profit participation suits.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Entertainment Law Update - Episode 13
In this Episode:
Follow Ups:  Justin Bieber; Tenenbaum, Kate Plus 8
Fleeting Expletives
JayZ wins
A few Fair Use cases
Copyrights, Trademark cases
Some BIG wins for plaintiffs in profit participation suits.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>3:21</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 12 &#8211; YouTube, Hurt Locker, Idea Theft &amp; More</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-12-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-12-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurt locker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode:

Follow up on Hot News
Viacom loses suit against YouTube.
Hurt Locker Suit(s)
Idea Theft
Tribute Band Names
Celebrity Rights of publicity]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-12-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode012.mp3" length="71141600" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>attorney,cle,copyright,credit,dmca,hurt locker,law,lawyer,media,podcast,publicity,safe harbor</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode: - Follow up on Hot News Viacom loses suit against YouTube. Hurt Locker Suit(s) Idea Theft Tribute Band Names Celebrity Rights of publicity</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this Episode:

Follow up on Hot News
Viacom loses suit against YouTube.
Hurt Locker Suit(s)
Idea Theft
Tribute Band Names
Celebrity Rights of publicity</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 11 &#8211; Hot News.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/05/episode011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/05/episode011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode: Ethics and the non-practicing attorney&#8230; a long tail Zorro draws its sword against M&#38;M candies &#8220;Free Scooter!&#8221; cries Justin Bieber. Dramatic vs. Non-Dramatic rights in musical works Ride-along producer : Ride-along defendant? Bryant v. Media Right, Orchard Arista v. Lime Group Hot News Misappropriation GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Quick Takes: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/05/episode011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode011.mp3" length="86463264" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode:   Ethics and the non-practicing attorney... a long tail   Zorro draws its sword against M&amp;M candies   &quot;Free Scooter!&quot; cries Justin Bieber.   Dramatic vs. Non-Dramatic rights in musical works </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In this Episode:


	Ethics and the non-practicing attorney... a long tail
	Zorro draws its sword against M&amp;M candies
	&quot;Free Scooter!&quot; cries Justin Bieber.
	Dramatic vs. Non-Dramatic rights in musical works
	Ride-along producer : Ride-along defendant?
	Bryant v. Media Right, Orchard
	Arista v. Lime Group
	Hot News Misappropriation



GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.


Quick Takes:
Ethics/Professional  Responsibility,  a long tail?  Caveats for non-practicing lawyers.
Randy Quaid, Lloyd Braun and the  lingering duties to former clients
Conflicts of Interest in the Entertainment Law Context
Just  for Kicks:  Legal Specialty areas you&#039;d never have thought of....
Tattoo Law: When Your Tattoo Turns Out  Not-so-&#039;Beatiful&#039;
tattoolaw.com
The  Law of Tattoos

Tattooed Brands  Global Survey 2009

Law  and Magic Blog
Zorro vs. M&amp;M  masked character
Zorro  sues over masked M&amp;Ms character

M&amp;M  Trademark Infringement with Zorro

Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Mars,  Inc. (ND Ca., filed March 22, 2010).




 

 

 
Manager liability for inciting a  riot?
Crime  Time: Should Justin Bieber&#039;s manager really be prosecuted for a mall  riot?--The Hollywood Reporter | Esq. | Entertainment and Media Law
Dramatic  vs. Non-dramatic musical works, concert vs. &quot;Grand Rights&quot; 


“Jersey Boys” Is Suing and Being Sued «  CREATE PROTECT

Frankie  Valli Files Suit Over &#039;Jersey Boys&#039; Knock-Off

Music Rights for  Plays and Musicals

Beauty,  Beast and Hunchback Score Dramatic Victory


Jersey Boys, LP v. Gehling, Cause No:1:2010cv03060  (SDNY), filed April 9, 2010.

Corbello v. DeVito, 1:2007cv00985, (ED Tex.  [Beaumont] filed Dec. 28, 2007 venue moved to 
Corbello  v. DeVito, 2:08-cv-00867-RCJ-PA, (Nev.).
Ride Along TV producer = ride-along  defendant?
Lexology - Federal court: media  defendants may be liable in Chicago ride-along case

Media  Ride-Alongs Lead to Civil Rights Suits
Bryant v.  Media Right, Orchard, et.al.
Did  an appeals court just give the music industry a big break?

Record Album Only Supports One  Statutory Damages Award -- Offer of Judgment in Copyright Cases
RIAA  vs. Limewire  win for the music industry.
RIAA  wins big in LimeWire lawsuit | Media Maverick - CNET News

http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/05/limewire-decision.html
HOT  NEWS
Appeals Court Puts Hold On Hot News Ruling Until Full Appeal Is  Done

Internet  Financial News Aggregator Enjoined under New York Hot News  Misappropriation Law : New Media and Technology Law Blog

Breaking  News: Dow Jones Files &quot;Hot News&quot; Case Against Briefing.com | Citizen  Media Law Project

Lexology  - Social networking sites that collect &quot;hot news&quot; are in the hot seat

The Trademark Blog: Get Your Hot News  Compaint Here

Lexology - Hot-news misappropriation
Recommended  Reading:
Tyler Ochoa  on the Legacy of the Statute of Anne</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:23:47</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re official!</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/05/were-official/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/05/were-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 06:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California CLE credit lawyers education mcle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official! We&#8217;ve been approved as a California CLE &#8216;Multiple Activity Provider&#8217;. What this means is that California CLE credit will now be available for all of our Entertainment Law Update podcast episodes&#8230; no more waiting for individual approval of each episode (after the fact).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/05/were-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast, Episode 10 &#8211; Use the force, big boy, and watch out for Beyonce&#8217;s undies.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/04/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-10-use-the-force-big-boy-and-watch-out-for-beyonces-undies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/04/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-10-use-the-force-big-boy-and-watch-out-for-beyonces-undies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    *  Intellectual Property protection of movie memorabilia, replicas, etc.
    * Big trouble over Big Boy statue
    * Avatar, Hurt Locker draw the inevitable lawsuits
    * Beyonce's underwear gets designer's panties in a twist.
    * and, more...

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/04/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-10-use-the-force-big-boy-and-watch-out-for-beyonces-undies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode010.mp3" length="64126007" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>*  Intellectual Property protection of movie memorabilia, replicas, etc.     * Big trouble over Big Boy statue     * Avatar, Hurt Locker draw the inevitable lawsuits     * Beyonce&#039;s underwear gets designer&#039;s panties in a twist.     * and, more...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>*  Intellectual Property protection of movie memorabilia, replicas, etc.
    * Big trouble over Big Boy statue
    * Avatar, Hurt Locker draw the inevitable lawsuits
    * Beyonce&#039;s underwear gets designer&#039;s panties in a twist.
    * and, more...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:06:37</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 9, Olympic trademarks, album integrity, and more.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/03/entertainment-law-update-episode-9-olympic-trademarks-album-integrity-avatar-litigation-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/03/entertainment-law-update-episode-9-olympic-trademarks-album-integrity-avatar-litigation-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    * IP and the Olympics
    * Sculptural works, photographs and subsequent uses
    * Album Integrity in the age of digital downloads
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/03/entertainment-law-update-episode-9-olympic-trademarks-album-integrity-avatar-litigation-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode009.mp3" length="72407839" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>* IP and the Olympics     * Sculptural works, photographs and subsequent uses     * Album Integrity in the age of digital downloads</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>* IP and the Olympics
    * Sculptural works, photographs and subsequent uses
    * Album Integrity in the age of digital downloads</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast, Episode 8 &#8211; Rights of Publicity, Et. Al.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/01/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-8-rights-of-publicity-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/01/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-8-rights-of-publicity-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Dick v. Google Vanessa Hudgens nude photos Taco Bell domain name issue, and more SHOW NOTES Estate of Philip K. Dick vs. Google - Trademark claims re &#8220;Nexus One&#8221; branding for mobile phone device Nexus One, the name of Google&#8217;s new phone, may be a reference to &#8220;Nexus-6&#8243; in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/01/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-8-rights-of-publicity-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode008.mp3" length="44276859" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.   Dick v. Google   Vanessa Hudgens nude photos   Taco Bell domain name issue,   and more - SHOW NOTES   Estate of Philip K. Dick vs. Google - Trademark claims re &quot;Nexus One&quot; branding for mobile phone d...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.


	Dick v. Google
	Vanessa Hudgens nude photos
	Taco Bell domain name issue,
	and more





SHOW NOTES

	
Estate of Philip K. Dick vs. Google -
Trademark claims re &quot;Nexus One&quot; branding for mobile phone d...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 7:  Problem Exists between keyboard and chair</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/12/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-7-problem-exists-between-keyboard-and-chair-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/12/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-7-problem-exists-between-keyboard-and-chair-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to an unexpected &#8220;error between keyboard and chair&#8220;, the recording of Episode 7 cannot be published. For those interested, however, the show notes for what would have been our December 2009 episode are here. SHOW NOTES Entertainment Law Update podcast episode 7 First, a word about Google Scholar http://scholar.google.com This service from google offers a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/12/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-7-problem-exists-between-keyboard-and-chair-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast, Epsiode 6 &#8211; Celebrity Identity Theft</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/11/episode6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/11/episode6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Approximate Running Time: 01:07 CLE CREDIT COMING SOON! Record Date:  November 16, 2009, 2:15pm PDT SHOW NOTES TOPICS: Quick Takes: Noonan v. Staples -  Jury: Truthful E-Mail Sent About Fired Staples Manager Wasn&#8217;t Libelous Disney settles with Luxo over the Luxo Jr. Lamp &#8211; .http://www.thresq.com/2009/11/pixar-luxo-lamp-settlement.html Carly Simon is suing her record label &#38; starbucks over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/11/episode6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode006.mp3" length="42892789" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Approximate Running Time: 01:07 CLE CREDIT COMING SOON! - Record Date:  November 16, 2009, 2:15pm PDT SHOW NOTES TOPICS:  Quick Takes:  Noonan v. Staples -  Jury: Truthful E-Mail Sent About Fired Staples Manager Wasn&#039;t Libelous </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Approximate Running Time: 01:07
CLE CREDIT
COMING SOON!



Record Date:  November 16, 2009, 2:15pm PDT


SHOW NOTES
TOPICS:

	Quick Takes:

	Noonan v. Staples -  Jury: Truthful E-Mail Sent About Fired Staples Manager Wasn&#039;t Libelous
	Disney settles with Luxo over the Luxo Jr. Lamp - .http://www.thresq.com/2009/11/pixar-luxo-lamp-settlement.html
	Carly Simon is suing her record label &amp; starbucks over poor marketing of record - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/arts/music/12simon.html?

	Response from Starbucks http://news.starbucks.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=283


	FTC Guidelines for Bloggers 


	http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/06/business/media/06adco.html?_r=3&amp;em
	

	Revised Endorsement and Testimonial Guides: http://ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005revisedendorsementguides.pdf
	FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 16 CFR Part 255, Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising: http://www2.ftc.gov/os/2009/10/091005endorsementguidesfnnotice.pdf


 
	Regs
	More helpful links:

	http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm


	Bottom line: if a blogger/celebrity has a relationship with a company, then she/he must be upfront about the relationship.  To be safe, disclose the connections you have.  If they sent you samples, tell your audience.  Think about what protects the consumer.







	

	
Vent v. Mars Snackfood U.S., LLC

	M&amp;M Mars not liable in idea submisson case surrounding &#039;addams family&#039; characters/cross promotion
	Entertainment Broker did not establish that there was a confidential or fiduciary relationship arising from her submission of idea to Mars.  Under  New Jersey Misappropriation of Idea Statute, plaintiff  mustshow that (1) the idea was novel; (2) it was made in confidence to the defendant; and (3) it was adopted and used by the defendant in connection with his own activities.. The district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss because Vent’s idea was not novel and because she did not convey it in confidence.
	The court also rejected Vent’s argument that it is customary in the entertainment and marketing industries for a pitch to be confidential; as the court noted, Mars is not in the entertainment or marketing industries and thus cannot be expected to know or abide by such standards. 








	

	 The Weinstein Co. v. Smokewood Entertainment Decision reached in &quot;Push&quot; case - emails do NOT satisfy the statute of frauds requiring written assignment of copyright interest, and did not suffice as evidence of agreement

	http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/11/oral_contract_n.html
	http://www.scribd.com/doc/22155496/Decision-Twc-Oral-Copyright
	http://www.thresq.com/2009/02/lionsgate-moves-first-to-dismiss-weinsteins-push-suit-.html
	http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/09/inside-the-battle-for-precious.html






	

	Jon Gosselin has countersued against TLC, on grounds that his contract is ILLEGAL - citing child labor violations, among other things
	(TLC is suing Gosselin for breach of contract exclusivity by appearing on other TV shows, engaging in celebrity endorsements, etc.




	California&#039;s new anti-paparazzi statute  -The amendment to the 11-year-old law which made it illegal for photographers to trespass, both physically and constructively, with the intention of photographing celebrities engaged in personal and familial activities in a &quot;manner that is offensive to a reasonable person&quot; – now allows plaintiffs to file suit against any media organization that sells, transmits or publishes an image knowing it was obtained through such illegal trespass.

	Prior Statute: (1998)

	http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=11029Beatles MP3s -


	2005 version http://www.hollywood.com/news/Arnold_Schwarzenegger_Approves_Tough_New_Paparazzi_Law/2445824
	2009 law

	http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/10/14/will-californias-new-anti-paparazzi-law-unleash-a-torrent-of-law-suits/


</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast, Epsiode 5 &#8211; of Hobbits, Lamps, Photographers &amp; Google Books</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-epsiode-5-of-hobbits-lamps-photographers-google-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-epsiode-5-of-hobbits-lamps-photographers-google-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Approximate Running Time: 01:03 CLE CREDIT COMING SOON! Show notes&#8230; after the jump Show Notes QUICK TAKES Launchcast is NOT an interactive service Launchcast is a webcasting service that provides users with individualized internet radio stations – the content of which can be affected by users’ ratings of songs, artists, and albums – is an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-epsiode-5-of-hobbits-lamps-photographers-google-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode005.mp3" length="30331469" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Approximate Running Time: 01:03 CLE CREDIT COMING SOON! Show notes... after the jump - Show Notes - QUICK TAKES   Launchcast is NOT an interactive service   Launchcast is a webcasting service that provides users...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Approximate Running Time: 01:03
CLE CREDIT
COMING SOON!




Show notes... after the jump

Show Notes





QUICK TAKES



	


Launchcast is NOT an interactive service




	Launchcast is a webcasting service that provides users with individualized internet radio stations – the content of which can be affected by users’ ratings of songs, artists, and albums – is an interactive service within the meaning of 17 U.S.C. § 114(j)(7).  If it is an interactive service, the webcasting service would be required to pay individual licensing fees to those copyright holders of the sound recordings of songs the webcasting service plays for its users


	

	


http://news.softpedia.com/news/Yahoo-Wins-Copyright-Infringement-Lawsuit-119902.shtml


	


http://www.thresq.com/2009/08/webcasting-interactive-launchcast.html


	


http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/2009/08/articles/internet-radio/court-of-appeals-determines-that-launchcast-is-not-an-interactive-service-thus-not-needing-direct-licenses-from-the-record-labels/


	


http://www.thresq.com/2009/08/webcasting-interactive-launchcast.html






	


Jessica Seinfeld&#039;s win in cookbook copyright case.



	


http://www.thresq.com/2009/09/jessica-seinfeld-wins-cookbook-copyright-lawsuit.html






	


The King of Beers not getting the royal treatment in Europe.  - Bud Battle?



	


http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/bud-battle-continues-in-czech-court/






	


Dish Network/Echostar fined $200 Million for contempt in TiVo Case



	


http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/court-awards-tivo-200m-in-damages-from-dishechostar-in-patent-case


	


/http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/2009/06/court-grants-tivos-motion-to-hold-echostar-in-contempt.html






	


United Transp. Union Local 1745 v. City Of Albuquerque

City of Albuquerque orders transcripts of hearings.  Plaintiff&#039;s attorney then obtains transcripts through Inspection of Public Records Act , instead of purchasing from Ct. Reporter service.  Service sues.  Held:   Defense.  No property right in the transcripts.



	


http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ExclusiveRights/~3/4MdN3qBKe7M/


	http://www.exclusiverights.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/United-Transportation-Union-Local-1745-v.-City-of-Albuquerque.pdf





PHOTOGRAPHY



	Annie Leibovitz in legal hot-water - 1 case settled, 1 to go

	Art Capital Group - Copyright as security for loans?
	This dispute is between Annie Liebovitz and Art Capital Group over Ms. Leibovitz&#039;s refusal or inability to pay back her $24 million loan by the deadline (9/8/09).  Currently, Art Capital Group and Ms. Leibovitz have reached an agreement: a new deadline will be set for the loan repayment and Leibovitz bought back the rights to sell her homes and copyrights.  The real dispute centers around money and is rooted in Ms. Leibovitz&#039;s inability to manage her finances properly.  But, the interesting part is that it involves a celebrity/icon leveraging the future value of her intellectual property.

	http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-leibovitz5-2009sep05,0,6842384.story


	Annie borrowed a total of $24 million with her life&#039;s work.  Annie&#039;s financial mismanagement almost caused her to default, but Art Capital Group gave her more time and let her buy back her copyrights.  Art Capital is worried that Annie will file for bankruptcy and then they&#039;ll have to deal with the courts handling all of her debt.  Where will they be in that line?


	Art Capital also sued Getty Images for negotiating a contract that violated the loan agreement&#039;s terms (confidentiality agreements) and making it difficult for Art Capital to sell Leibovitz&#039;s archives

	&quot;Getty announced earlier this year it would represent Leibovitz for some current assignments, a deal which Art Capital said violated confidentiality agreements it had with Getty.&quot; 


</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listener Survey:  Let us know what you think of Entertainment Law Update podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/listener-survey-let-us-know-what-you-think-of-entertainment-law-update-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/listener-survey-let-us-know-what-you-think-of-entertainment-law-update-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve created a short survey. Please share your opinions with us, so we can continue to improve our podcast. Click Here to take survey]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/listener-survey-let-us-know-what-you-think-of-entertainment-law-update-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 4 &#8211; The Pope &amp; Little Mermaid turn it up to 11.</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/episode-4-the-pope-little-mermaid-turn-it-up-to-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/episode-4-the-pope-little-mermaid-turn-it-up-to-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLE CREDIT COMING SOON! Show Notes Legislation &#38; Rulemaking Copyright Office &#8211; Fees for Special Handling of registration applications will be waived for applications that have been pending for 6 months, and where the registration is needed  because the applicant is about to file an action for infringement.  37 CFR Part 201 Copyright Office &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/episode-4-the-pope-little-mermaid-turn-it-up-to-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode4.mp3" length="35753986" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>CLE CREDIT COMING SOON! Show Notes Legislation &amp; Rulemaking  Copyright Office - Fees for Special Handling of registration applications will be waived for applications that have been pending for 6 months,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>CLE CREDIT
COMING SOON!






Show Notes
Legislation &amp; Rulemaking

	Copyright Office - Fees for Special Handling of registration applications will be waived for applications that have been pending for 6 months, and where the registration is needed  because the applicant is about to file an action for infringement.  37 CFR Part 201


	Copyright Office - proposed changes to deposit requirements  http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/BLOG/post/Copyright-Office-Proposes-Change-to-Copyright-Deposit-Requirements.aspx
	This applies to Section 407 deposits.  (unpublished works) http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap4.html#407
	The proposed amendments would change current practice by permitting the Copyright Office to issue a demand for copies of works published only online.  The revised regulations would also establish the process for issuing and responding to a Copyright Office demand, amend the definition of a “complete copy” of a work for purposes of mandatory deposit of online–only works, and establish new best edition criteria for electronic serials available only online.  The copyright Office is seeking public comment on these proposed regulation change.  These comments are due on August 31st.

Court Quick-takes 

	Joel Tenenbaum admits to file-sharing, and,  after Directed verdict on liability, jury returns damage award of $675,000 
	Salinger Case

	http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/BLOG/post/Chapter-Two--No-Sequel-To-Catcher-In-The-Rye-In-The-US.aspx

	Amicus Briefs Filed

	http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/BLOG/post.aspx?id=3efb60a0-a0b1-4d45-b17c-616e8621e422
	http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2009/08/more-on-the-appeal-in-the-salingercolting-case.html






	9th Circuit changes stance on &quot;prevailing party&quot; in dismissals without prejudice
	9th Circuit finds personal jurisdiction/venue by &quot;purposeful availment&quot; - makes it easier to reach a Defendant in the plaintiff&#039;s choice of venue. 

Religion - The Pope&#039;s view of intellectual property laws. 

Sports

	Reebok to Marcin Gortat: Jordan Tattoo Won&#039;t Fly -- NBA FanHouse
	Who&#039;s liable for the Erin Andrews nude video?--THR, Esq. - Entertainment and Media Law.
	Photographer Sues ESPN for Copyright Infringement over Unauthorized Photo Use
	NCAA and Rights of Publicity of student athletes (during and after college)

	&#039;NCAA Football &#039;10&#039; offers drama on field and off - Doug Elfman


	Sports of The Times - A Lasting Image - Standing Up to the N.C.A.A. - NYTimes.com



Political uses of pop music 

	McCain settles with Jackson Browne
	ENTERTAINMENT LITIGATION: ANOTHER REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN SUED OVER USE OF MUSIC  - Entertainment Litigation Blog

Obama /NORML poster - copyrightissues.
(see the photo and poster in question)

Sculptures and Sculptural Works

	Wall Street Bull

	http://www.businessinsider.com/wall-street-bull-artist-sues-author-of-lehman- brothers-book-2009-7
	http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=ac6dQjEhFGFs&amp;refer=us





	Mermaid

	http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090731/0337175728.shtml
	http://www.thedailynews.cc/Main.asp?SectionID=2&amp;SubSectionID=11&amp;ArticleID=29001z



	LEGO refuses permission for spinal-tap video on DVD</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 1 now approved for CLE credit in California</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/entertainment-law-update-episode-1-now-approved-for-cle-credit-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/entertainment-law-update-episode-1-now-approved-for-cle-credit-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLE Credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[_ Listen for free. Get CLE credit for only $19.99 If you are a California attorney and have listened to Episode 1 of the Entertainment Law Update podcast, you can receive Participatory CLE credit by clicking the button to the right. After your transaction is complete, you will receive your compliance certificate by email. Episode [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/08/entertainment-law-update-episode-1-now-approved-for-cle-credit-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 3 &#8211; Bloggers, Journalism &amp; Defamation</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLE CREDIT ($19.99) [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:5:end] SHOW NOTES In this episode: MCLE Approval &#8211; California Approved Episode 1, pending on 2 and 3.  Once we&#8217;ve got 4 under our belt, we can apply to be approved as a provider, and the process will be a lot easier. Thanks to Mark Saku, an IP attorney in Seattle  for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/07/entertainment-law-update-episode-3-bloggers-journalism-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode3.mp3" length="80131396" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>CLE CREDIT ($19.99)  [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:5:end] SHOW NOTES In this episode:   MCLE Approval - California Approved Episode 1, pending on 2 and 3.  Once we&#039;ve got 4 under our belt, we can apply to be approved as a provider,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>CLE CREDIT
($19.99)  [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:5:end]






SHOW NOTES
In this episode:


	MCLE Approval - California Approved Episode 1, pending on 2 and 3.  Once we&#039;ve got 4 under our belt, we can apply to be approved as a provider, and the process will be a lot easier.




	Thanks to Mark Saku, an IP attorney in Seattle  for his help investigating CLE approval process in  Washington, Oregon &amp; Idaho.


LEGISLATION/RULEMAKING/ADMINISTRATIVE
Copyright Fees are increasing effective August 1, 2009


	http://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html

Pandora Web Radio reaches a settlement on music royalty rates.

	http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2009/07/pandora-agrees-to-new-royalty-plan-will-start-char.html
	http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/technology/2009/7/10/riaa_negotiates_rates_with_pandora_online.htm
	http://gizmodo.com/5309421/pandora-agreement-saves-internet-radio
	http://www.marketwatch.com/story/internet-radio-saved-at-a-small-cost?siteid=nwhpm

ASCAP wants to be paid when your phone rings


	 http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/ascap-wants-be-paid-
	http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InPropriaPersona/~3/XzhJ0lIJCWM/

CASES
Jammie Thomas - Rassett loses file sharing suit brought by RIAA - $1.9 Million Verdict!
Capitol v. Thomas, No. 06-1497 (D. Minn., 2009)

	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_v._Thomas
	http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/riaa-jury-slaps-2-million-fine-on-jammie-thomas/
	http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10268199-93.html
	 Comprehensive List of Links to Commentary
	Comprehensive List of Court Docs

JD Salinger prevents publication of new book
Salinger v. Colting, No. 09-50905 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) Order

	http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/A-Sequel-to-Catcher-In-The-Rye.aspx
	http://www.askbeforeyouact.org/blog/post/Chapter-Two--No-Sequel-To-Catcher-In-The-Rye-In-The-US.aspx
	http://entertainmentagentblog.com/2009/06/30/catcher-and-the-lye/
	http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/Ei1C17yNSAk/
	http://www.1010wins.com/pages/4512245.php?contentType=4&amp;contentId=4099583

YOUTUBE CASE OF THE MONTH
Google Class Action:  No foreign plaintiffs without US Copyright registrations may be part of the class. (The Football Assn. Premier League v. YouTube)




	http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/
	http://www.youtubeclassaction.com/

TENENBAUM LITIGATION
(THE CIRCUS CONTINUES)

	Labels have made Motion for Summary Judgment re Tenenbaum;s fair use defense.

	 http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html


	Counterclaims re Abuse of Process - Dismissed, Motion to join RIAA - denied, Questions unconstitutionality of Statutory Damages - deferred

	http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/06/tenenbaum-court-dismisses-counterclaims.html




	Tenenbaum&#039;s attorney in the crosshairs.

	http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/labels-reply-to-nesson-on-recordings.html
	http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/07/nesson-responds-to-osc-re-taping-claims.html


	Some other links about the Tenenbaum case: http://www.entmedialaw.com/?query=tenenbaum



FAIR USE CORNER
Does an Anti-Plagiarism Service Violate Students&#039; Copyrights when it maintains a database (i.e., copies) of  student papers?

	http://www.theiplawblog.com/archives/-copyright-law-does-an-antiplagiarism-service-violate-students-copyrights.html

Supreme Court Denies Cert in Cablevision online DVR case.
NOVELTY CASE OF THE MONTH
Man sues over use of canned music in British production of a musical... and wins!   (UK  case)

	http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/richard_morrison/article6661672.ece?openComment=true

Lindt Chocolate Bunny trademark dispute? (Belgium? Switzerland? EU?)


	http://jetl.wordpress.com/2009/06/15/lindt-defends-chocolate-bunny/

Yes, Lindt does have a US trademark registration for “Chocolate, chocolate products, namely,</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 2</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLE CREDIT ($19.99) [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:4:end] SHOW NOTES In this episode: Congratulations to Maren Christensen, Executive VP and General Counsel at Universal Studios,  who&#8217;s been named Beverly Hills Bar Association&#8217;s Entertainment Lawyer of the Year for 2009. Supreme Court Nominee  Sotomayor&#8217;s background and 2nd Circuit ruling in favor of statutory damages as deterrent. Backlog at the Copyright [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode2.mp3" length="75328232" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>copyright,entertainment,law,media,podcast</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>CLE CREDIT ($19.99) [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:4:end] SHOW NOTES In this episode:   Congratulations to Maren Christensen, Executive VP and General Counsel at Universal Studios,  who&#039;s been named Beverly Hills Bar Association&#039;s Ent...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>CLE CREDIT
($19.99)
[wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:4:end]






SHOW NOTES
In this episode:

	 Congratulations to Maren Christensen, Executive VP and General Counsel at Universal Studios,  who&#039;s been named Beverly Hills Bar Association&#039;s Entertainment Lawyer of the Year for 2009.
	Supreme Court Nominee  Sotomayor&#039;s background and 2nd Circuit ruling in favor of statutory damages as deterrent.
	Backlog at the Copyright Office

	Washington Post Article
	Copyright Office Response


	Does the Register of Copyrights hold office lawfully?  A pending Constitutional Appointments Clause challenge  questions the validity of CRB appointments, but what about the Register&#039;s ministerial Acts?
	Sports Leagues losing control of fantasy-sports leagues as Courts rule that the First Amendment trumps rights of publicity, and player statistics, etc., where there&#039;s a public interest in the information.

	CBS Interactive, Inc. v. NFL Players Ass’n, Inc. (U.S. District of MN 2009)
Civil No. 08-5097 ADM/SRN
	CBC Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.
505 F.3d 818 (8th Cir. 2007)


	Good discussion of &quot;Access&quot; element of copying analysis in ruling on Summary Judgment for Defendant in song plagiarism suit.

	Brainard v. Vassar, (U.S. District, M.D., Tennessee 2009) 3:07-cv-00929


	Warner Music issues DMCA Takedown on Organization that hosted Prof. Lessig talk
	Woody Allen/American Apparel case settles

	 Complaint
	Answer to Complaint 
	Order and Stipulation re: Settlement


	Supreme Court refuses to hear Steinbeck copyright termination appeal

	Penguin Group v. Steinbeck, 537 F.3d 193 (2nd Cir. 2008)
	Classic Media, Inc. v. Mewborn, 532 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2008) (involving Lassie rights)


	SAG settles Force Majeure claims
	Tenenbaum&#039;s fair use argument - Case is set for trial July 20.

	Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, 07-11446, E.D. Mass. 2007 Consolidated into Capital Records, Inc. v. Alaujan, 03-11661,E.D. Mass. 2007
	See Case documents at http://joelfightsback.com/about-the-case/legal-documents/</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premiere Episode (001):  Are Partners&#8217; creative efforts Works-Made-For-Hire?</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/04/premiere-episode-001-are-partners-creative-efforts-works-made-for-hire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/04/premiere-episode-001-are-partners-creative-efforts-works-made-for-hire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLE CREDIT ($19.99) [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:1:end] SHOW NOTES In this episode: SAG &#38; AMPTP have arrived at a deal&#8230; The competing  &#8220;Octomom&#8221; trademark  registrations Is giving a (loaded)  iPod as a gift an act of copyright infringement? (First Sale and Fair Use) (President&#8217;s gift to Queen ElizabethII) Copyright and Defamation issues in new social media&#8230; Twitter, Facebook, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/04/premiere-episode-001-are-partners-creative-efforts-works-made-for-hire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/001_Entertainment_Law_Update.mp3" length="57562692" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>CLE CREDIT ($19.99) [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:1:end] SHOW NOTES In this episode:  SAG &amp; AMPTP have arrived at a deal...   The competing  &quot;Octomom&quot; trademark  registrations   Is giving a (loaded)  iPod as a gift an act of copyrigh...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>CLE CREDIT
($19.99)
[wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:1:end]






SHOW NOTES
In this episode:

	SAG &amp; AMPTP have arrived at a deal...
	The competing  &quot;Octomom&quot; trademark  registrations
	Is giving a (loaded)  iPod as a gift an act of copyright infringement? (First Sale and Fair Use) (President&#039;s gift to Queen ElizabethII)
	Copyright and Defamation issues in new social media... Twitter, Facebook, etc. Courtney Love being sued..  a cautionary tale for anybody who uses the Web?

	 1st Circuit won&#039;t review defamation ruling in Noonan vs. Staples.


	Copyright holders taking action against content &quot;scraping&quot; websites.  (Hot News doctrine)
	Fair Use, YouTube, DMCA takedowns, etc. -

	YouTube says 37% of DMCA takedown notices are not valid copyright claims, etc.
	Wish Upon a star&quot; - Fox&#039;s &quot;Family Guy&quot; &quot;parody&quot;/&quot;satire&quot;


	Litigation:  &quot;Push&quot; lawsuits - When is a deal a deal?

Featured Topic:  Ownership of partners&#039; and principals&#039; intellectual property contributions to a business in the absence of employment agreements.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Gordon Firemark</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing the Entertainment Law Update Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/04/introducing-entertainment-law-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/04/introducing-entertainment-law-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Launching April 20th Entertainment Law Update is an audio podcast featuring Entertainment attorneys Gordon P. Firemark and Tamera Bennett. Every month, our hosts and guests will survey the legal landscape of the entertainment industry, discussing the top cases and news stories of interest to lawyers and entertainment business professionals. Each episode will feature a news [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/04/introducing-entertainment-law-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
