<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast &#187; law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/tag/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com</link>
	<description>Now offering CLE credit for California Lawyers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:22:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.9" mode="advanced" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>Now offering CLE credit for California Lawyers!</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Entertainment Law Update Podcast</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" />
	<copyright>Copyright 2010 Gordon P Firemark</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>Now offering CLE credit for California Lawyers!</itunes:subtitle>
	
	<itunes:category text="Business" />
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 12 &#8211; YouTube, Hurt Locker, Idea Theft &amp; More</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/06/30/entertainment-law-update-episode-12-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/06/30/entertainment-law-update-episode-12-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurt locker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode:

Follow up on Hot News
Viacom loses suit against YouTube.
Hurt Locker Suit(s)
Idea Theft
Tribute Band Names
Celebrity Rights of publicity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin: 0px 60px 140px 0px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow up on Hot News</li>
<li>Viacom loses suit against YouTube.</li>
<li>Hurt Locker Suit(s)</li>
<li>Idea Theft</li>
<li>Tribute Band Names</li>
<li>Celebrity Rights of publicity</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: right;">
<p style="text-align: right;">
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.<span id="more-600"></span></p>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
</div>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Follow ups:</strong></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/TechnicallyLegal/%7E3/Tw0DmzogvH8/" target="_blank">Google and Twitter Weigh In on Hot News</a></span></div>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65L0OI20100622" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Google, Twitter go to bat for Theflyonthewall| Reuters</span></a></span></h4>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=b941ea06-445a-444d-a953-1a8abf3171d0">Don Henley Wins case against California Politician</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Quick Takes</strong></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a id="sj-4" title="Title:  Copyright Office supports Broadcast Performance Royalty" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=86708491-5526-401a-945f-1cec5661ed76&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-06-15&amp;utm_term="><span style="font-weight: normal;">Copyright Office supports Broadcast Performance Royalty</span></a></span></h4>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Bill cite:</strong></span></span> <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Performance Rights Act, HR 848 in the House and S. 379 in the Senate</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Copyright office letter issued June 7, 2010- </span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10707sp.pdf">http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10707sp.pdf</a></span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Court upholds CRB royalty setting</strong></span></div>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-22/ringtone-copyright-royalty-upheld-by-appeals-court-update1-.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Ringtone Copyright Royalty Upheld by Appeals Court (Update1) &#8211; BusinessWeek</span></a></span></h4>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Case cite:</strong></span></span> <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><em>Recording Industry Association of America Inc. v. Librarian of Congress</em></span></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">, 09-1075 (US Ct. App. DC (Washington)(opinion issued June 22, 2010).</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>9th Circuit joins 5th and 7th Circuits, ruling that copyright registration need only have been FILED before bringing an infringement suit.</strong> The 10th and 11th take the inverse position that registration certificate must be in hand.   (see <a id="unjx" title="17 USC § 411(a)" href="http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap4.html#411">17 USC § 411(a)</a>) and <a id="vvt6" title="This article" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0ebf328d-e72a-4dd9-9b6c-684278c7c309&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-06-11&amp;utm_term=">This article</a>)</p>
<p>Case Cite:<span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><a id="ngo6" title="COSMETIC IDEAS, INC. v. IAC/InteractiveCORP, Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2010" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1977738541170814278&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr"> COSMETIC IDEAS, INC. v. IAC/InteractiveCORP, Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2010</a></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Michael Douglas&#8217; ex-wife, Deandra sues for share of his earnings from &#8220;Wall Street 2&#8243;</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/michael-douglas-wife-diandre-douglas-cashes-wall-street-11041113</span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: x-small;"> </span></strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Viacom/Google(YouTube) case</strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><em><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/33467870/Viacom-v-YouTube-Summary-Judgment">Viacom International Inc. v. Youtube, Inc., Youtube, Llc, and Google, Inc.</a></em></span><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/33467870/Viacom-v-YouTube-Summary-Judgment">Link to decision:</a></span></p>
</div>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/google-beats-viacom-in-major-copyright-case.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Google beats Viacom! Read the full YouTube decision</span></a></span></h4>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/what-viacoms-loss-to-youtube-means-for-hollywood.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">What Viacom&#8217;s loss to YouTube means for Hollywood</span></a></span></h4>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.musictechpolicy.com/2010/06/eff-never-met-artist-they-didnt-want-to.html">Music Technology Policy Op. Ed. from Chris Castle</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>HURT LOCKER lawsuits</strong></span></div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
</div>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><a id="vhi." title="thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/bittorrent-piracy-lawsuit-update.html" href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/bittorrent-piracy-lawsuit-update.html">Is it legal to sue thousands of people in one suit?</a></span></div>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://jetl.wordpress.com/2010/06/03/hurt-locker-producers-seek-to-hurt-pocketbooks-of-online-downloaders/" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">“Hurt Locker” Producers Seek to Hurt Wallets of Thousands of Individuals for Unlawful File-Sharing « JETLawBlog: The Official Blog of the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law</span></a></span></h4>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><a id="xl6t" title="EFF's Amicus Brief" href="http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/uscg_does/Achte-Neunte%20Final%20Brief.pdf">EFF&#8217;s Amicus Brief</a></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Idea Theft:  Last Samurai  and Ghost Hunters cases</strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong><span style="font-size: small;"><em><a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1526767.html">Benay v. Warner Bros. Entm&#8217;t, Inc., No. 08-55719</a></em></span></p>
<p><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/ninth-circuit-last-samurai-stolen-idea-pitch-contract.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Appeals court gives life to &#8216;Last Samurai&#8217; idea theft claim</span></a></strong></p>
</div>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><a href="http://reporter.blogs.com/files/08-569541.pdf"><strong>Montz v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, Inc.</strong></a></p>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a id="gfzv" title="court sides with NBC Universal in 'Ghost Hunters' idea theft case" href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/appeals-court-nbc-universal-ghost-hunters.html"><span style="font-weight: normal;">court sides with NBC Universal in &#8216;Ghost Hunters&#8217; idea theft case</span></a></span></h4>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://law.rightpundits.com/?p=1643" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">‘Heroes’ sued by Comic Book Artist Jason Barnes » Right Juris</span></a></span></h4>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/fx-arms-itself-to-defend-sons-of-anarchy-suit-.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">FX arms itself to defend &#8216;Sons of Anarchy&#8217; suit</span></a></span></h4>
<h3><span style="font-size: small;"><a id="ol0l" title="Judge rules A&amp;E mishandled 'Steven Seagal: Lawman' claim" href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/judge-rules-ae-mishandled-steven-seagal-lawman-claim.html"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Judge rules A&amp;E mishandled &#8216;Steven Seagal: Lawman&#8217; claim</span></a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>TRADEMARKS and TRIBUTE BANDS</strong></span></div>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/7802270/Abba-tribute-bands-warned-to-change-their-names.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Abba tribute bands warned to change their names &#8211; Telegraph</span></a></span></h4>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><em> </em></span></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;">RIGHT OF PUBLICITY</span></h4>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></p>
</div>
<div id="s56n">
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><img class="alignright" title="Einstein" src="http://www.greenbergglusker.com/Templates/media/images/Blogs/LawLawLand/Einstein.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="235" /></span></span></p>
</div>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">-</span><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100527/0928299600.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">University Sues GM For Using Einstein In An Ad Without Paying Up | Techdirt</span></a></span></h4>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a id="admk" title="&quot;A Living For The Dead&quot; | CBS 60 Minutes" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6600771n&amp;tag=mncol;lst;1">&#8220;A Living For The Dead&#8221; | CBS 60 Minutes</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><a id="admk" title="&quot;A Living For The Dead&quot; | CBS 60 Minutes" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6600771n&amp;tag=mncol;lst;1"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com">Watch CBS News Videos Online</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><a id="ko20" title="Links To Various State's Right of Publicity Statutes" href="http://rightofpublicity.com/statutes">Links To Various State&#8217;s Right of Publicity Statutes</a></p>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><a id="f6g2" title="Clearance is Sexy, too." href="http://entertainmentlawblog.greenbergglusker.com/2010/06/clearance_is_sexy_too.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+EntertainmentLawyerBlogCom+%28Entertainment+Lawyer+Blog%29">Clearance is Sexy, too.</a></span></p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>- Hulk Hogan sues over Cocoa Pebbles Commercial</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><a href="http://www.randazza.com"><img class="aligncenter" title="boulder and hogan" src="http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/boulder-and-hogan.jpg?w=450&amp;h=229" alt="" width="450" height="229" /></a></p>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"> here&#8217;s the video: <a id="dfuq" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7S7KFKmYP4" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7S7KFKmYP4">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7S7KFKmYP4</a></span></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="405" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/E7S7KFKmYP4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="405" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/E7S7KFKmYP4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6&amp;border=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #3d85c6;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></p>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2010/06/02/hulk-hogan-brings-questionable-right-of-publicity-suit/" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Hulk Hogan Brings Questionable Right of Publicity Suit « The Legal Satyricon</span></a></span></h4>
<h4><span style="font-size: small;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://siouxsielaw.com/2010/05/24/hulk-hogan-versus-bamm-bamm/" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Hulk Hogan Versus Bamm Bamm « Siouxsie Law</span></a></span></h4>
<p><a id="qd._" title="Marlon Brando Estate v. Joe's Jeans" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=130ae90e-3ba8-43ca-96cd-be581d1aa376&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2010-06-29&amp;utm_term">Marlon Brando Estate v. Joe&#8217;s Jeans</a></p>
</div>
<div>Jeans co. marketing products bearing the name &#8220;the Brando&#8221;, &#8220;The STella&#8221;, and &#8220;The Wild One&#8221;  <a id="wm_a" title="(Complaint)" href="http://www.manatt.com/uploadedFiles/News_and_Events/Newsletters/AdvertisingLaw@manatt/Brando%20Enterprises%20v.%20Joe%27s%20Jeans.pdf">(Complaint)</a></div>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/mo-supreme-court/1110608.html">Doe v. TCI Cablevision, 110 SW 3d 363 </a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2010/06/30/entertainment-law-update-episode-12-youtube-hurt-locker-idea-theft-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode012.mp3" length="71141600" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>attorney,cle,copyright,credit,dmca,hurt locker,law,lawyer,media,podcast,publicity,safe harbor</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>In this Episode: - Follow up on Hot News Viacom loses suit against YouTube. Hurt Locker Suit(s) Idea Theft Tribute Band Names Celebrity Rights of publicity</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)

In this Episode:


	* Follow up on Hot News
	* Viacom loses suit against YouTube.
	* Hurt Locker Suit(s)
	* Idea Theft
	* Tribute Band Names
	* Celebrity Rights of publicity



GET CLE CREDIT (http://cle-podcasts.com/store)  (http://cle-podcasts.com/store)for this episode.


 


Follow ups:
 
Google and Twitter Weigh In on Hot News (http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/TechnicallyLegal/%7E3/Tw0DmzogvH8/)
Google, Twitter go to bat for Theflyonthewall| Reuters
Don Henley Wins case against California Politician (http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=b941ea06-445a-444d-a953-1a8abf3171d0)

 

 
Quick Takes
 

 
Copyright Office supports Broadcast Performance Royalty
Bill cite: Performance Rights Act, HR 848 in the House and S. 379 in the Senate

Copyright office letter issued June 7, 2010- http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10707sp.pdf (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10707sp.pdf) 
Court upholds CRB royalty setting
Ringtone Copyright Royalty Upheld by Appeals Court (Update1) - BusinessWeek
Case cite: Recording Industry Association of America Inc. v. Librarian of Congress, 09-1075 (US Ct. App. DC (Washington)(opinion issued June 22, 2010).

 

9th Circuit joins 5th and 7th Circuits, ruling that copyright registration need only have been FILED before bringing an infringement suit. The 10th and 11th take the inverse position that registration certificate must be in hand.   (see 17 USC § 411(a) (http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap4.html#411)) and This article (http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0ebf328d-e72a-4dd9-9b6c-684278c7c309&amp;utm_source=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology%20subscriber%20daily%20feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology%20Daily%20Newsfeed%202010-06-11&amp;utm_term=))

Case Cite: COSMETIC IDEAS, INC. v. IAC/InteractiveCORP, Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2010 (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1977738541170814278&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr)

 

 

Michael Douglas&#039; ex-wife, Deandra sues for share of his earnings from &quot;Wall Street 2&quot;

 

 
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/michael-douglas-wife-diandre-douglas-cashes-wall-street-11041113
 

 



Viacom/Google(YouTube) case

 

Viacom International Inc. v. Youtube, Inc., Youtube, Llc, and Google, Inc. (http://www.scribd.com/doc/33467870/Viacom-v-YouTube-Summary-Judgment)Link to decision: (http://www.scribd.com/doc/33467870/Viacom-v-YouTube-Summary-Judgment)


Google beats Viacom! Read the full YouTube decision
What Viacom&#039;s loss to YouTube means for Hollywood
Music Technology Policy Op. Ed. from Chris Castle (http://www.musictechpolicy.com/2010/06/eff-never-met-artist-they-didnt-want-to.html)

 
HURT LOCKER lawsuits


 

 


Is it legal to sue thousands of people in one suit? (http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/06/bittorrent-piracy-lawsuit-update.html)
“Hurt Locker” Producers Seek to Hurt Wallets of Thousands of Individuals for Unlawful File-Sharing « JETLawBlog: The Official Blog of the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law
EFF&#039;s Amicus Brief (http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/uscg_does/Achte-Neunte%20Final%20Brief.pdf)
 


Idea Theft:  Last Samurai  and Ghost Hunters cases

 Benay v. Warner Bros. Entm&#039;t, Inc., No. 08-55719 (http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1526767.html)

Appeals court gives life to &#039;Last Samurai&#039; idea theft claim


 

 

Montz v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, Inc.
court sides with NBC Universal in &#039;Ghost Hunters&#039; idea theft case
‘Heroes’ sued by Comic Book Artist Jason Barnes » Right Juris
FX arms itself to defend &#039;Sons of Anarchy&#039; suit
Judge rules A&amp;E mishandled &#039;Steven Seagal: Lawman&#039; claim
 
TRADEMARKS and TRIBUTE BANDS
Abba tribute bands warned to change their names - Telegraph
 

 
RIGHT OF PUBLICITY


 




</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Entertainment Law Update Podcast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update &#8211; Episode 2</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/06/02/entertainment-law-update-episode-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/06/02/entertainment-law-update-episode-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>firemark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLE CREDIT ($19.99) SHOW NOTES In this episode: Congratulations to Maren Christensen, Executive VP and General Counsel at Universal Studios,  who&#8217;s been named Beverly Hills Bar Association&#8217;s Entertainment Lawyer of the Year for 2009. Supreme Court Nominee  Sotomayor&#8217;s background and 2nd Circuit ruling in favor of statutory damages as deterrent. Backlog at the Copyright Office [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="150"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7" style="margin: 6px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" width="150" bgcolor="#dddddd"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>CLE CREDIT</strong><br />
($19.99)<br />
<object><form action="https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr" method="post"><input type="hidden" name="cmd" value="_xclick" /><input type="hidden" name="business" value="entertainmentlawupdate@gmail.com" /><input type="hidden" name="item_name" value="" /><input type="hidden" name="amount" value="" /><input type="hidden" name="currency_code" value="USD" /><input type="hidden" name="item_number" value="4" /><input type="hidden" name="notify_url" value="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-cart-for-digital-products/paypal.php" /><input type="hidden" name="return" value="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/survey" /><input type="hidden" name="mrb" value="3FWGC6LFTMTUG" /><input type="hidden" name="custom" value="" id="eStore_custom_values" /><input type="image" src="" class="eStore_buy_now_button" alt="Buy Now"/></form></object></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span id="more-90"></span></p>
<hr />
<h2 style="text-align: center;">SHOW NOTES</h2>
<p>In this episode:</p>
<ul>
<li> Congratulations to <strong><em>Maren Christensen</em></strong>, Executive VP and General Counsel at Universal Studios,  who&#8217;s been named Beverly Hills Bar Association&#8217;s Entertainment Lawyer of the Year for 2009.</li>
<li>Supreme Court Nominee  Sotomayor&#8217;s background and 2nd Circuit ruling in favor of statutory damages as deterrent.</li>
<li>Backlog at the Copyright Office
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/18/AR2009051803171.html" target="_blank">Washington Post Article</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Copyright Office Response</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Does the Register of Copyrights hold office lawfully?  A pending Constitutional Appointments Clause challenge  questions the validity of CRB appointments, but what about the Register&#8217;s ministerial Acts?</li>
<li>Sports Leagues losing control of fantasy-sports leagues as Courts rule that the First Amendment trumps rights of publicity, and player statistics, etc., where there&#8217;s a public interest in the information.
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/04/30/FantasyFootball.pdf" target="_blank">CBS Interactive, Inc. v. NFL Players Ass’n, Inc. (U.S. District of MN 2009)<br />
Civil No. 08-5097 ADM/SRN</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.svmedialaw.com/Fantasy%20Baseball%20opinion.pdf" target="_blank">CBC Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.<br />
505 F.3d 818 (8th Cir. 2007)</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Good discussion of &#8220;Access&#8221; element of copying analysis in ruling on Summary Judgment for Defendant in song plagiarism suit.
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=a125dced-3bba-4e0b-afc4-4cb20660c486" target="_blank">Brainard v. Vassar, (U.S. District, M.D., Tennessee 2009) 3:07-cv-00929</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Warner Music issues DMCA Takedown on Organization that hosted Prof. Lessig talk</li>
<li>Woody Allen/American Apparel case settles
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=5448c85e-78ac-481a-bb69-e8917a65d5ef" target="_blank">Complaint</a></li>
<li><a href="http://jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3900360a-9b9e-4527-808c-e9f7f4ce1315" target="_blank">Answer to Complaint </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=88ef35a1-1ec3-4103-9d67-1cf3441dc28c" target="_blank">Order and Stipulation re: Settlement</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Supreme Court refuses to hear Steinbeck copyright termination appeal
<ul>
<li>Penguin Group v. Steinbeck, 537 F.3d 193 (2nd Cir. 2008)</li>
<li>Classic Media, Inc. v. Mewborn, 532 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2008) (involving Lassie rights)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>SAG settles Force Majeure claims</li>
<li>Tenenbaum&#8217;s fair use argument &#8211; Case is set for trial July 20.
<ul>
<li>Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, 07-11446, E.D. Mass. 2007 Consolidated into Capital Records, Inc. v. Alaujan, 03-11661,E.D. Mass. 2007</li>
<li>See Case documents at <a href="http://joelfightsback.com/about-the-case/legal-documents/" target="_blank">http://joelfightsback.com/about-the-case/legal-documents/</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/2009/06/02/entertainment-law-update-episode-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode2.mp3" length="75328232" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>copyright,entertainment,law,media,podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle> -  -  CLE CREDIT ($19.99) [wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:4:end] -  -  -  SHOW NOTES In this episode: -    Congratulations to Maren Christensen, Executive VP and General Counsel at Universal Studios,  who&#039;s been named Beverly Hills Bar Association&#039;s Ent...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>


(http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png)

CLE CREDIT
($19.99)
[wp_eStore_buy_now:product_id:4:end]






SHOW NOTES
In this episode:

	*  Congratulations to Maren Christensen, Executive VP and General Counsel at Universal Studios,  who&#039;s been named Beverly Hills Bar Association&#039;s Entertainment Lawyer of the Year for 2009.
	* Supreme Court Nominee  Sotomayor&#039;s background and 2nd Circuit ruling in favor of statutory damages as deterrent.
	* Backlog at the Copyright Office

	* Washington Post Article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/18/AR2009051803171.html)
	* Copyright Office Response (http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/)


	* Does the Register of Copyrights hold office lawfully?  A pending Constitutional Appointments Clause challenge  questions the validity of CRB appointments, but what about the Register&#039;s ministerial Acts?
	* Sports Leagues losing control of fantasy-sports leagues as Courts rule that the First Amendment trumps rights of publicity, and player statistics, etc., where there&#039;s a public interest in the information.

	* CBS Interactive, Inc. v. NFL Players Ass’n, Inc. (U.S. District of MN 2009)
Civil No. 08-5097 ADM/SRN (http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/04/30/FantasyFootball.pdf)
	* CBC Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P.
505 F.3d 818 (8th Cir. 2007) (http://www.svmedialaw.com/Fantasy%20Baseball%20opinion.pdf)


	* Good discussion of &quot;Access&quot; element of copying analysis in ruling on Summary Judgment for Defendant in song plagiarism suit.

	* Brainard v. Vassar, (U.S. District, M.D., Tennessee 2009) 3:07-cv-00929 (http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=a125dced-3bba-4e0b-afc4-4cb20660c486)


	* Warner Music issues DMCA Takedown on Organization that hosted Prof. Lessig talk
	* Woody Allen/American Apparel case settles

	*  Complaint (http://jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=5448c85e-78ac-481a-bb69-e8917a65d5ef)
	* Answer to Complaint  (http://jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3900360a-9b9e-4527-808c-e9f7f4ce1315)
	* Order and Stipulation re: Settlement (http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=88ef35a1-1ec3-4103-9d67-1cf3441dc28c)


	* Supreme Court refuses to hear Steinbeck copyright termination appeal

	* Penguin Group v. Steinbeck, 537 F.3d 193 (2nd Cir. 2008)
	* Classic Media, Inc. v. Mewborn, 532 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2008) (involving Lassie rights)


	* SAG settles Force Majeure claims
	* Tenenbaum&#039;s fair use argument - Case is set for trial July 20.

	* Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, 07-11446, E.D. Mass. 2007 Consolidated into Capital Records, Inc. v. Alaujan, 03-11661,E.D. Mass. 2007
	* See Case documents at http://joelfightsback.com/about-the-case/legal-documents/ (http://joelfightsback.com/about-the-case/legal-documents/)


</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Entertainment Law Update Podcast</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
